We Need More Direct Democracy

Representative government fails when corruptIn thinking about direct democracy I was
politicians mostly serve corporate and otherreminded of the all too prevalent view that
special interests. Then it is crucial for citizens toBarack Obama will challenge the traditional, money
have direct democracy opportunities. This meansdominated two-party control of Washington
having the right to place initiatives or referenda onpolitics. So, I pose this challenge to Obama: If you
ballots that can make new laws, amendtruly represent a force for fixing a divisive and
constitutions, recall elected officials, or controlineffective political system, then why don't you
taxes and government spending.explicitly come out in favor of creating more
Though many local and 24 state governmentsdirect democracy opportunities? Why not
provide rules for some ballot measures andcondemn all attempts to crush ballot measures
initiatives, they have been limited by diverseand initiatives? And why not help start a national
establishment, status quo political interests on thediscussion of the possibility of a federal ballot
left and right that feel threatened by such populistinitiative mechanism?
citizen power.When over 80 percent of Americans see the
I was impressed by the recent Wall Streetnation on the wrong track it is fair to conclude
Journal article by John Fund: The Far Left's Warthat representative government has failed. The
on Direct Democracy. He made the point thattwo-party plutocracy has too much power. This is
direct democracy, though sorely needed, hasthe ideal time to recognize the limits of electoral,
been successfully crushed by ugly tactics fromrepresentative democracy and become an
those interests that would rather use their moneyadvocate for more direct democracy.
and influence to control legislative and otherPresident Theodore Roosevelt, in 1912, wisely
government functions. They fear citizen power.observed "I believe in the Initiative and
They know how to control elections andReferendum, which should be used not to destroy
manipulate voters. "Unfortunately, some specialrepresentative government, but to correct it
interests have declared war on the initiativewhenever it becomes misrepresentative." Direct
process, using tactics ranging from restrictive lawsdemocracy is all about converting the notion of
to outright thuggery," said Fund.sovereignty of we the people into reality.
I agree with Fund's summation: "RepresentativeIt comes to this: Should we be content to put our
government will remain the enduring feature offaith in elected representative or should we put it
American democracy, but the initiative process isin ourselves? When you vote for candidates you
a valuable safety valve. ...attempts to arbitrarilydon't put your faith in yourself, you put it in them.
curb the initiative, or to intimidate people fromHaven't we been disappointed enough in those
exercising their right to participate, must beelected? We have less to fear from the will of
resisted. It's a civil liberties issue that should unitethe majority than from the actions of dishonest,
people of good will on both the right and left."corrupt and plutocracy-serving elected officials.
If this sounds reasonable to you, then theFor political reform seeking Americans the litmus
appropriate question to ask of presidentialtest for presidential candidates should be whether
candidates is straightforward: Do you supportthey support more direct democracy. If Obama is
providing more direct democracy opportunities?not just about rhetorical change, but a true
Indeed, many people want some way of creatingreformer of the political system, then we need to
a federal ballot initiative mechanism whereby thehear from him on this issue.
misdeeds or inaction of government could beLet him explain whether or not he supports what
addressed by Americans voting directly to getRalph Nader does, who has said that presidential
the transparent and accountable government andcandidates should "put front and center
effective public policies they want. A national ballotempowering the American people in direct
measure to end the Iraq war would havedemocracy format so they can move in when
succeeded in 2006, for example. Puttingtheir so-called representatives cave in to the
Democrats in control of Congress did not work.interests of big business. ...Campaign finance
Do we need the ability to recall a presidentreform has got to go hand in hand with direct
because of dishonesty, incompetence anddemocracy like initiative, referendum, recall." His
wrongheaded policies? Yes.current platform says that we need "more direct
Also consider that the two-party plutocracy hasdemocracy reflecting the preamble to our
been able to stifle political opposition by makingconstitution which starts with 'we the people,' and
third party and independent candidates unable tonot 'we the corporations.'"
grasp any real power, as they can do in mostCan you imagine Obama saying these things? I
other democracies.can't.