The Core Idea of Democracy

irst requirement is to remember the critical role ofrather than that they will benefit citizens.
the legislature in the integrity system. TheWhere special interests provide election funding,
essential insight of ‘ethics regimes’the policies may be very much to the detriment
and ‘integrity systems’ is that noof the citizens. Furthermore, there is a tendency
single institution can provide the answer and thatto use questionable tactics — including the
each must support the other. We would argueuse of government advertising and the
that a democratic legislature can and shouldmanipulation of information reaching the public
provide the lynchpin of the integrity system.— to secure re-election.
First, government officials only have power to actHere, we come to a permanent tension within
according to the law and Parliament can anddemocracy that no integrity system can eliminate
should carefully consider what powers they givebut merely limit. The core idea of democracy is
to public officials.that the people delegate executive and/or
Secondly, members and committees askinglegislative power to politicians whom the electors
questions of government can provide a focal pointbelieve will best use that power to serve
for the reporting of questionable practices. Thiselectors’ interests.
strengthen independent bodies by giving themIt is in the interests of governments to use that
someone to report to, follow up reports, andpower in ways that will earn approval and
provide public protection to those who are makingconvince a majority that it is the better choice.
valid criticisms of governments. If a parliamentaryHowever, there is always a temptation to use
body can demand documents, testimony, andgovernmental power to secure re-election by
information from government, then it strengthensavoiding or distorting that choice. The crudest
Freedom of Information legislation by making theform of avoiding that choice involves a
withholding of documents pointless (conversely, ifcancellation or postponement of elections.
the legislature cannot demand such documentsHowever, there are many other means of
then resisting FOI requests is a more viableavoiding that choice — distorting electorates
tactic).and electoral boundaries, manipulating electoral
However, if committees of the legislature are topractices and electoral machinery, and using
perform their functions they cannot begovernmental power to silence opposition or
government controlled. The most likely way topromote government policies. The temptation is
ensure this is to select them from a house that isso great that it might seem that only strong laws
elected on a different basis to the government. Inwill suffice. Certainly, there is a need for clear
presidential systems this will frequently be theconstitutional provisions, electoral laws with teeth,
case, in bicameral systems it is often the case.and independent electoral commissions with clear
Reformers should seek to ensure that theprocedures for calling elections and counting the
electoral system permits the chamber orvotes.
chambers providing the committees to be electedThere is a need for clear legal rules on electoral
on a different basis. This allows them to operateadvertising, election funding, and government
as a house of review rather than a rubber stampadvertising. However, wherever there is power,
(where controlled by the government) or a housethere is a temptation for abuse. It is important
of obstruction (where controlled by thethat the fundamental democratic principles
opposition). Where there is no such house whichunderlying those laws be clearly and publicly
can operate in this way, the possibility ofarticulated and attempts made to live by them.
appointing independent chairs, agreed to by bothPoliticians in a democracy are members of a very
government and opposition, and would provide animportant public profession. Politicians seek to
interesting and viable alternative.articulate policy choices and put them before the
If the legislature is to perform this criticalpeople. If they believe that their policies and the
oversight function, legislators have to seegeneral philosophy underlying them are correct,
themselves as public officials performing a criticalthey should be proud to promote those policies
public service rather than mere ciphers for theand should believe that those public values and
party machines. We are not suggesting anpublic policies deserve to be chosen on their
elimination of the party system and amerits by their fellow citizens. To seek to win by
‘return’ to legislators acting onother means discredits those values and policies
their individual consciences. This should involve theand dishonors their profession. Most politicians
justification of the party system for what it canwould hold to some such set of beliefs and would
offer the public and a justification of the office ofonly justify deviations as defenses (or
legislator that reflects the vital role they play inpre-emptive strikes) against even worse
the democratic governance of the nation.deviations by their political adversaries.
Political parties should see themselves as puttingThis is where the integrity system is challenged
alternative views of the way that public powerand where it must be strongest — in its
can be exercised for the benefit of the citizens.laws and institutions (including ethics advisors,
Most politicians enter politics with a belief thatethics committees, a free press, FOI etc.) and
different public policies can make a difference andwith, as always, ethical standard setting leading
that they and their party’s set of policiesthe way by providing a source of legal principle
will, on balance, improve the life of citizens. Theand a standard for judging institutional reforms.
problem is that, in the search for power, this isSuch value based co-ordinate means are the key
often forgotten and policies are put forward onto going ‘beyond best practice’ in
the basis that they will get the politician re-electedgovernance reform.