Voting And Non-Voting Behaviors In 2004 US Presidential Election

The USA presidential election is conducted everystates supported the Democratic candidate, John
4 years in November. It uses a system ofKerry. But this is just a mere generalization if one
"first-past-the-post" or "winner-takes-all" whichsays that in the 2004 presidential election, party
means the candidate who gets the majority ofidentification model was the most important
popular votes does not necessarily win; what isfactor. Nevertheless, its importance is not
more important is getting the majority ofquestionable.
electoral votes. In such a system an individualThe most important factor in voting theories of
might feel that his vote can not make athe 2004 was about issue voting. In other words,
difference in the outcome of the election andvoters paid a lot of attention to the issues that
therefore may choose not to vote at all. That iswere supported by candidates. Above all people's
why some scholars believe about 50 per cent ofconcern was the issue of national security including
people who are eligible to vote prefer to stay atterrorism and moral values which was advocated
home and not to show up in the Election Day.by Bush. On the other hand, Kerry's slogan was
In this paper, the theories of voting and"stronger at home, respected in the world." And
non-voting behavior in 2004 presidential electionhe also paid more attention to economic issues
are discussed. In other words, we are going tolike jobs and health care. One should bear in mind
see whether party identification model or issuethat the 2004 election was the first presidential
voting played an important role in individuals'election after Sep. 11, 2001 and very logically if
opinions who voted and if they did not vote, whatone felt threatened, the best candidate to vote
was the reason behind that?for would be a Republican. And very basically that
The United States presidential election of 2004was the reason why individuals voted for George
was between the Republican candidate, GeorgeW Bush.
Walker Bush, the President of the United StatesThe percentage of voting-age citizens taking part
and the defeated Democratic candidate, Johnin the 2004 presidential election was higher than
Kerry, the junior United States Senator fromthe previous one in 2000. 64 percent of voter
Massachusetts.turnout (126 million) in the 2004 election was a
Bush received about 51 percent of the votes castrecord number for a presidential election. Among
(62 million votes), while Kerry received about 4872.1 percent of the people registered, 63.8 voted,
percent (59 million votes). Bush could get 286that is to say 16 million registered voters did not
electoral votes and Kerry 251. The counting ofcast a ballot. Well, there were different reasons
the votes in the state of Ohio was controversialwhy these registered nonvoters did not show up:
and many believed that if voting in Ohio had20 percent said that they were too busy on the
proceeded fairly, Kerry would have become theElection Day, 15 percent said that they were ill or
US president.had a family emergency, and 11 percent said that
There was only a slight difference between thethey felt their votes would not make a difference
states which voted for Democrats and the onesin the outcome. Other reasons included being out
which voted for Republicans in comparison to theof town, not liking the candidates, confusing about
2000 presidential election. The difference is to dovoting or registration, etc.
with only three states. Bush took Iowa and NewAll in all, the element which was of great
Mexico (combined 12 electoral votes), both wonimportance in the 2004 presidential election was
by Al Gore in 2000, while Kerry took Newabout issue voting and the issue which most
Hampshire (4 electoral votes), which Bush hadpeople were concerned about was national
previously won. Bush got a net gain of 8 electoralsecurity. People chose their future president
votes from these switches.retrospectively, as the Republican Party is known
This result is to do with party identification model.for being a better leader when it comes to
That is to say the Southern states generallyforeign policy and therefore national security.
voted for George W Bush, while the Northern