The Democratic Justice - A Study By Artur Victoria

st recognize that it could not cope with theis no logic in this regard. A historical analysis leads
Democratic Justice, without establishing a patternto the simple observation that poor countries are
of expression, which tends to discourage, theeven poorer in relation to their creditors and not
restructuring of the highest known. For thisto make the desired corrective justice. Increased,
reason it is taking the concept of”rhetoric"unlike the national poverty while rich countries
of nutrients that part of the premises acquired bybetter economic conditions of life for its citizens.
the analysis of them with the support of otherThis shows that it is better to borrow money and
premises, if necessary, to raise the concept ofreceive back with interest in obtaining a
Democratic Justice study. And you do not agreedistributive justice for its citizens.
with Perelman when he says that justice isFinally, we can say that the law is present in
presented as a confused concept? But ECO is aAristotle's rhetoric as a technique Geräte, to
comment used to believe that a true positiveensure the effectiveness of the movement, with
effect of the rhetoric of nutrients in the conceptpositive effects for society, while politics is an
of Democratic Justice:apparent movement, which, according to ECO
The first movement is effective: from purchased"(...) We seem to lead to new decisions (buying a
premises and arguments, criticize, review andproduct, according to a political opinion), but in
make stylistic inventing cadences that, althoughdoing so, part of the premises, arguments and
according to some general trends of our systemstylistic rhythms belonging to the universe and
of expectations, indeed the richest.accepted and therefore urges us to do, but are
This means that the principle of excluded middle,apparently different, it always did. "
expression of Aristotelian logic has never beenThis is why Kelsen, having developed the
out of the knowledge process of justice. Topurification of law by a scientist from the
make a final decision on the merits in courtappropriation of formal logic, not to take criticism
proceedings, the judge has only two options:Aristotle. Rather, it is your ally and stressed its
either convicted or acquitted the accused. Thereimportance in which, indeed, Aristotelian logic is
is also in the operative part of a prayer room forfertile ground in the law and getting practical
ontic logic, these three fields of ontic prohibited,results for the company, marking its presence in
permitted and necessary to generate thethe knowledge processes of justice, but is
beginning of the fourth excluded. They can beirrelevant in terms of Democratic Justice Policy,
useful in understanding the values used by thewith a view to possible use of a classification, is
magistrate, as principles of interpretation of law,near some of the tenets of Aristotle, that
distributive justice, on the basis of the sentence,through his theory of the division allows the
but in the end, the judge has no way out of thedistance to defend the possibility that the Justice
Aristotelian logic corrective justice, convicted orhave more of a knowledge process. Furthermore,
not convicted. There is also a demand that maythe general equitable principle of universal justice
contain several requests from both the authorAristotelian principle of democratic justice, but
and the defendant. They applied the samerelied on a new footing. This concept, issues of
reasoning. The judges use the term "action basedunparalleled importance for the development of
in part" by accepting only any of the claimsthe State on the lines as closely as possible right
dismissed as others that just seems unfair in lightaway, therefore, the pure faith in justice, which is
of the whole. Forensic and normal expression thatthe hallmark of the works of Plato . In fact, in
also involves the elimination of non-Aristotelianpolitics, Aristotle examines the power of the state
logic.from a constitution, divided into three parts: one
Politics in the opposite occurs with thethat deals with the discussion of public affairs, the
indiscriminate application of Aristotelian logic. Yousecond set of public functions and the third on the
can generate some gross errors.organization of power judiciary.
1 = premise of democracy is rule by theGiven the division of remedial and distributive
representation obtained by the free choice of thejustice in the judiciary should be tried under the
majority, 2 = premise that most people chooserules of corrective justice, i.e. to separate the
the representation is poor, the poor end = morefunctions of government and has an autonomy of
representative elected to government posts. Bothdecision. It is exactly what Aristotle in the sense
assumptions are quite true. Why, then, the logicalthat it does not mention the role of the judiciary
conclusion is not? But if, on the one hand, formalin government but could come from the State
logic suitable for legal discourse, but, finding noConstitution. What is left to conclude that,
other political activity in the right direction. Fewaccording to Aristotle, the law excludes from the
poor people in position to compete for electedconcept of Justice, although not its integral part, it
office, which is a serious flaw in representativeis understood that the law, an Aristotelian view,
democracy, while in the law, with improveddoes not guarantee a completely fair selection,
procedural techniques, improved daily access ofespecially in front of the virtues The fact led him
the poor to the judiciary, primarily guaranteeingto use logic to explain that the law can be a
the right of action, established as a fundamentalvirtue only if it eliminates other options available,
principle of law in the State Constitution.and furthermore within corrective justice.
In fact, you cannot find logical deductions in aDistributive justice would be at the mercy of
traditional form of security to ensure democracyhuman nature, since man is political by nature, is
in the knowledge of political and administrativeagainst reason to understand the nature and
justice. Take this example: One is a poor countryrationale of the law, subjecting them to the
and B is a rich country, which has the moneyvirtues. The only element which then can interact
borrowed from B, to eradicate poverty; Bwith nature and the law is that equity Democratic
reproduces the capital borrowed plus interest;Justice considers that the necessary balance to
conclusion, eradication of poverty. Obviously, therehis concept.