Reasons to Fire Your Mutual Fund Company - Enablers of Poor Corporate Governance

An entire book could be written about the happyCompany management gets to decide who
conspiracy between corporate managers and thehandles these assets on behalf of their
investment community that pads both pockets atemployees. Corporate managers who take a dim
the expense of the everyday shareholder. In fact,view of shareholder activism (and who does,
one has been written. You should check out "Theexcept those that are abusing shareholders?) are
Battle for the Soul of American Capitalism" byunlikely to award this business to institutions who
John Bogle, the founder of the Vanguard Group.meddle too much. Management wants
Bogle has been one of the few mutual fundshareholders to blindly follow the
industry luminaries that publicly decry the abuserecommendations of management. Shareholders
taking place. It is an easy read. Check it out. Manywho file corporate resolutions and offer up
of my top ten reasons are touched on in thiscompeting board slates are not likely to get a
book.piece of the company's investment assets.
Over fifty percent of corporate America isThe second conflict is similar to the first. So many
owned by the top 100 financial fiduciaries. Oneof the mutual fund industry's parent companies
would think that this alone would make them thealso have operations in investment banking. They
most vigilant voices in the boardroom. In fact,are reluctant to raise hay because offending their
few mutual funds demand accountability frommanagement clients may result in their firms being
management, and in many of the most egregiousleft out in the cold when it comes to investment
cases, they are guilty of downright aiding andbanking deals.
abetting the fudging of numbers and the looting ofThis is really a shame. Mutual funds have the
otherwise good corporations. Why? Two glaringexpertise, the resources, and the position to
conflicts of interest prevent the industry fromdemand accountability from management. Instead,
becoming the activists that they should become.management has used the diffusion of corporate
First, every company is a potential client for 401kownership to increase their pay, fudge the
and pension administration. Over half of invest-ablenumbers, cut sweetheart deals, etc. Bogle calls
assets are in defined contribution plans (401k,this a transition from "owners' capitalism" to
403b, etc) or defined benefit plans (pensions)."managers' capitalism".