Radio Interoperability Needs Governance More Than Technology

Even individually tackling some of the manyradio system manager for a locality - you're
problems that hinder interoperability today -probably going to have a ton on your plate. You
proprietary technology, insufficient radio spectrumdon't have a lot of time to go out and see what
and lack of funding - won't lead to fullother localities are doing. Usually you're so busy,
communication among first responders until allyou're going to just get your immediate job
stakeholders involved begin to collaborate.done."
Though the level at which the governanceIt sometimes takes pressure from officials to get
structure should originate is open for discussion,the stakeholders to the table, Clark said. "In some
what's not is that the interoperability problem,places the financial - and in many places the state
though it only rears its ugly head occasionally,- pressure to save money and resources by
must be fixed. The National Governorsjoining 800 MHz trunk systems has overcome
Association tabbed it as its top priority, and it willwhatever local reluctance there might have been,"
take painstaking, coordinated efforts amonghe said. "It's worked better in some places than
first-responder and local agencies to do it.others."
In a recent exchange before the SenateIn many areas, it's taken an event to rally a
Committee on Homeland Security andregion around interoperability. "It is a lot easier to
Governmental Affairs, U.S. Department ofget local agencies in northern Virginia, Maryland
Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michaeland the District of Columbia excited about
Chertoff sparred with committee member Rep.interoperable communications," Clark said, "since
Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., who criticized Congressthe last 20 years of problems that were
for blocking $3.1 billion in grants for police and fireoccasioned by the lack of interoperability."
agencies to spend on equipment. "This is not,There's no magic formula for getting stakeholders
frankly, a technology issue," Chertoff said. "This isto the table, McCarley said. "In some areas there
an issue of having community leaders come to anare regional planning groups, regional planning
agreement."authorities," she said. "In some areas it's more of
Though technology standards and spectrum playa community of interoperability among cities that
key roles in solving the interoperability puzzle, thehave joined together having comparable facilities.
pieces won't come together without extensiveIt depends on the state, really. I'm a big believer
planning and coordination. That much is thein local control, local initiatives, and where local
consensus.initiatives get the job done, I think it's an excellent
"It's a coordination problem," said Chris Essid,solution for taxpayers in that area."
coordinator for Virginia's statewide interoperabilityRegional events, like the recent Strong Angel III
program. "It's 90 percent coordination, 10 percentexercise in San Diego at which Steckler manned a
technology. It's easy to go buy equipment andcommand center, are a good way to build a social
say, 'We put some equipment out there.' Butnetwork among first responders and ease cultural
what's difficult is the policies, procedures,anxieties. "One of the main themes is bringing
governance and coordination of it."disparate groups together," Steckler said.
My New ToysIt's important for first-responder agencies to
The technology exists to fix the interoperabilitypractice communicating, and to review procedures
problem. A solution with technology as its core,and develop solutions to long-standing problems.
however, will end up as others before it - failingOften resources are available but not used. After
or even exacerbating the interoperability problem.Las Vegas held a tabletop exercise in February
"I've been in public safety a long time," said2006 as part of the Nevada Regional
APCO's McCarley. "I've seen several technicalCommunications Interoperability Pilot project, a
fixes for interoperability put in place that wereSAFECOM program, the city realized it was
feasibly workable. They worked fairly well, butunderutilizing two mutual aid channels, relying
they all fell by the wayside for one reason orinstead on cell phones and dispatchers. The
another."channels were functional, but first responders
McCarley said in some cases there was noweren't trained how to use them.
ongoing policy to ensure the technology was usedWhatever the initial vehicle for developing regional
correctly and only for public safety purposes. Ascoordination, it must be taken up as a new way
a result, she explained, the technology ended upof doing business. In many states and local areas,
being used for other things, such as routine trafficEssid said, the problem of interoperability is left to
stops, and then faded as a viable public safetya fire chief or police chief. "Interoperability part
tool.time; I just look at that and go, 'Wow. If
In other cases, a lack of training condemned thesomeone is doing it part time, it's not going to
efforts, or one agency had no interest in workingwork.'"
with another, such as police not working with fire.All indications are that states will have to get
After 9/11, money was made available forserious about regional interoperability and the
technological upgrades, but that hasn't come closeNational Incident Management System (NIMS) to
to solving the problem. "The first knee-jerkcontinue receiving DHS funds. "Sometimes, just
reaction was to throw money at it," Essid said,like everywhere, you've got strong personalities,
adding that now, every locality has a mobileand maybe some folks just say, 'We don't want
command center, and in some places, the fireto coordinate with them, and we'll go it alone,'"
department and law enforcement each have one.Essid said. "But as I've said before, their days are
"It became very clear we were not solving thenumbered."
problem. Everyone is going out and buying newRegional collaboration too can reduce costs for an
toys, and what we need is governance andindividual agency while developing interoperability,
coordination at the state and regional level toKearns said. "From my perspective, the solution is
figure out what the priority for the region shouldto do more things collaboratively with other
be. Unfortunately a lot of money was spent toagencies and jurisdictions. Not only can this help
get to this point over the last few years."spread high-capital expenditures over a larger
What happened after 9/11 seemed to perpetuatefunding base, it can result in systems covering
the problem of agencies and locals adoptinglarger areas and more agencies. Interoperability
stand-alone systems, which John Clark saw asbecomes a natural byproduct, but not the driving
former deputy chief of public safety for the FCC.reason for the expenditure. The driving force was
"They wanted to maintain their own FCC license -getting effective communications for the 99
their own completely stand-alone communicationpercent of the time that they don't need
system," he said. "We heard this again and again.interoperability, they just need to communicate
The local sheriffs, local police chiefs didn't want toeffectively on a daily basis within their own
lose any control over their communicationsagency."
systems; they saw it as a security issue, as wellEssid said more than $1 billion has been spent on
as a control and turf issue."infrastructure in Virginia, and millions are saved
That has been evident in locales that purchased,when jurisdictions coordinate their purchases.
as part of a state mandate, technology calledWhen one local agency learned that it was
cross-band switches that could bridge the gapplanning on deploying the same system being used
between disparate radio systems, but never putin a nearby jurisdiction, it saved $6 million on
it to use, said Mayer-Schönberger.maintenance and construction by partnering with
"First-responder agencies bought boxes that couldthat jurisdiction.
patch together two or more different networks,Interoperability Full Time
but many of these agencies never unpacked theThat's the kind of collaboration Virginia was aiming
box and tried it," he said. "It's sitting in storagefor when it created its Statewide Communications
rooms, but was bought to tick off a mandate toInteroperability Planning program, which Nevada
become interoperable. That worries me."and Kentucky have adopted as well. This plan
Even standards, such as Project 25, designed toestablishes a governance structure and develops
help first responders get on the same page inlocal government focus groups that collaborate on
terms of technology, accomplish little if there's nothe needs of each locality and the state as a
collaboration. There could be adjoining jurisdictionswhole. Virginia's program is run from the
with Project 25 standard systems that won't talkgovernor's office by a full-time interoperability
to each other if there is no plannedcoordinator - Essid.
interoperability. "Technical standards are not really"Virginia said we need to create a full-time position
the problem," Clark said. "Having the standardin the governor's office or high up in government
doesn't solve the problem. You still need the will toto let everybody know it's a priority, and we
connect the two systems [through a centralneed this person to work with all the different
switch that connects a central talk group] andfirst responders," Essid said of his position.
then you need the protocol for how the systemThere are few, if any, positions like his in the
is to be used. The will to do it is more of acountry so far, but SAFECOM recommends that
problem than the technology or the standards tostates have a full-time interoperability coordinator.
allow it to happen.""Some states have a position, say, in technology.
Project 25 standards were developed to allowAgain, I like to harp on this: This is not a
digital voice radios to operate with one another,technology problem," Essid said. "I coordinate with
and Project 25-compliant equipment is being soldthe technology folks too; they're one of the
as an interoperable solution. But two Projectstakeholders. But you might lose your relationship
25-compliant systems won't communicate ifwith the first-responder community if you just
they're operated in different bands, which is oftenthrow it over to technology; you just start to
the case and won't change anytime soon.think of everything in a technological frame of
"There is no practical way all of public safety couldmind."
be migrated into a single band with adequateThe statewide plan creates a forum for state and
performance characteristics and bandwidth tolocal first responders to share ideas and concerns.
meet all public safety needs," said Kevin Kearns,Often, the plight of one agency or jurisdiction is
executive director of iXP Corp. "We will alwaysdifferent from that of its neighbor.
have public safety agencies working in multiple"We're there to offer lessons learned from one
bands, and therefore some form of bridginglocality to another," Essid said. "The stakeholders
technologies has to be employed to allow them towill share information with each other. By working
interoperate."as a group, we've got all kinds of input and
These bridging technologies are available, but sopotential solutions to any problems that folks are
far the necessary preplanning and coordinationencountering, so that's a good example of
across jurisdictional lines haven't come to fruition -discussing problems of different frames of mind."
and there's no rush to gain interoperability in mostThe process, Essid said, was driven by local
areas. "We're hearing now," Clark said, "thatagencies that were called to the table and asked
money being made available to first respondersto identify statewide needs and problems, and
for communications is being put in to upgradeEssid's office facilitates the adoption of lessons
their communications, but not necessarily upgradelearned. The 800 MHz rebanding issue is an
them in an interoperable way."example of how the state can address local
Defining the Needneeds and provide guidance. In addition, Essid hired
That's not surprising, Clark said, because thea consultant to examine where the state is in
majority of the time, most first-responderterms of rebanding, and how it can help some
agencies only needto use internal communications.local agencies by sharing lessons learned from
"The difficulty here is how much you want toothers.
invest in those terrible instances that only comeAnother key issue identified by the local agencies
around once in a while," he said. "So that issue -was the reliance on language protocols that differ
of how important this is compared to otherfrom one agency to the next. That was the key
priorities - is the real issue, and the issue thattopic at the two-day Virginia Interoperable
needs to be addressed at the national level."Communications Conference held in October 2006
The federal government is in the position toin Portsmouth, Va., announcing an initiative
recognize where the need is and where fundingwhereby local agencies statewide will now use
should be allocated, Clark said, whereas the localstandard language. "We announced our Common
agency has great incentive not to invest inLanguage Protocol that will move Virginia
something in which the return on investmentresponders from using 10-codes to plain language,
(ROI) might be difficult to measure.which is required by NIMS," Essid said. "This is the
Brian Steckler, lecturer for the Department ofperfect example of coordination. This is an
Information Science at the Naval Postgraduateinitiative based on coordination and not technology.
School in Monterey, Calif., knows from experienceEven if you could technologically communicate,
after the 2004 Southeast Asian tsunami thatyou're not capable of doing it if you're using
regardless of the ROI, interoperability - not justdifferent codes. It's like you speaking Japanese
between jurisdictions but agencies - could beand me speaking Russian. You say the wrong
critical during a disaster. "You want as much of acode and you could get someone hurt."
chance for situational awareness as possible, andThe initiative is two years in the works, and was
trust and everybody reading from the samedeveloped by getting local agencies to the table to
sheet of music," he said. "You don't know howdiscuss the issue. The commonwealth will take the
important that is until you get down there in theprotocols to SAFECOM and hopes that upon
field and sometimes a fireman from oneendorsement, it will be implemented nationwide.
jurisdiction may not need to talk to a firemanEssid said it's critical that states coordinate among
from another, but lots of times they do."themselves and develop a standard protocol.
Essid said many state and local agencies downplay"My [comment to SAFECOM] is, if every state
the need for coordination and/or just don't getcomes up with a different way of implementing
around to it. "People get bogged down so muchplain language - here we go again.
with their own duties," he explained. "Say you're a