Protecting Our Rights - Parliamentary Procedure is More Than Nitpicking!

Active people attend meetings. At meetings ofedition, in 1970.
youth groups like the Scouts and Future FarmersMeanwhile, Alice Sturgis recognized the need for a
of America, service clubs like Kiwanis and Rotary,simplified and modernized procedure. She wrote
school boards and parent-teacher associations,Sturgis Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure
even state and national legislative bodies, peoplein 1950, and a second edition thereafter. After her
more or less follow parliamentary rules. Why?death the American Institute of Parliamentarians
Parliamentary procedure balances the rights of therevised the book into The Standard Code of
majority, the minority, and individual members, asParliamentary Procedure, 3rd edition, 1988, and
well as enables an organization to do its business.4th edition, 2001. Both Robert's Rules - Newly
When an assembly ignores the rules, the rights ofRevised, 10th edition, 2000 - and the Standard
the members of the body - and of the peopleCode - 4th edition, 2001 - are in current use, the
they represent - are trampled. An assembledmain differences being the simpler procedures and
body may be a civic, recreational, professional, orless formal and archaic language of the Standard
legislative group.Code.
"The great lesson for democracies to learn is forThere are other manuals, some written specifically
the majority to give to the minority a full, freefor legislative bodies, like Jefferson's 1801 Manual
opportunity to present their side of the case, andof Parliamentary Practice for the U.S. Senate.
then for the minority, having failed to win aLuther S. Cushing wrote Lex Parliamentaria
majority to their views, gracefully to submit andAmericana: Elements of the Law and Practice of
to recognize the action as that of the entireLegislative Assemblies, which first appeared in
organization, and cheerfully to assist in carrying it1856, which had been used by several state
out, until they can secure its repeal." So wrotelegistures, and which continues in use, now in a
Henry Martyn Robert, author of Robert's Rules of1999 edition. The U.S. House of Representatives
Order, in his Parliamentary Law (1923).has used Hinds' Precedents (1901), named after
Sometimes called rules of order, parliamentaryauthor Asher C. Hinds; Cannon's Precedents
procedure recognizes that the majority vote used(1935), named after Clarence Cannon; and
with open debate results in a decision that reflectsDeschler's Procedure (1979), named after Lewis
the will of the assembly better than aDeschler. The U.S. House now uses House Rules
decision-making system that seeks consensus,and Manual, and the U.S. Senate uses standing
although parliamentary procedure does notrules collectively called Senate Procedure - both
preclude consensus; Henry Robert himself oftenavailable online (at and
achieved consensus through effective debate andMason's Manual of Legislative Procedure is used in
parliamentary procedure.about 35 states by both the state House and
"The customs and rules of meetings - theSenate, used in addition to chamber rules, as
practices that go by the ungainly termparliamentary procedure still recognizes specific
'parliamentary procedure' - are the bedrock ofrules of the authorizing body. Paul Mason designed
democracy, the mechanism by which a group ofhis manual specifically for state legislatures; the
people can make fair and equitable decisions,"first edition appeared in 1935, and the National
according to the American Institute ofConference of State Legislatures published the
Parliamentarians. The term parliamentary derivedcurrent edition in 2000.
through British parliaments and Middle English fromParliamentary procedure, regardless of which
the Old French word parlement, which in turnmanual spells out the rules, is based on
derived from parler, parlier - to speak, talk.precedents, a system of principles, and reason:
Parliamentary rules facilitate civil, polite, courteousupon "reasonable and equitable customs." Mason,
language that addresses the question before theoriginal author of Mason's Manual of Legislative
assembly.Procedure, defined "ten fundamental principles that
Americans have used various parliamentarygovern procedure":
procedures over the years, often local versions,1. The group must be so constituted and
especially during colonial times. The Firstendowed that it has the power and authority that
Continental Congress in 1774 drafted minimalit purports to exercise.
"rules of conduct to be observed in debating and2. There must be a meeting of the group at
determining questions"; for example, the delegateswhich the decision is made.
decided to cast votes by colony, one vote per3. There must be proper notice of the meeting so
colony regardless of population. When Vicethat all members of the group have an
President Thomas Jefferson presided over theopportunity to attend and participate.
U.S. Senate, he saw a need for more detailed4. There must be a quorum present at the
rules. His Manual of Parliamentary Practicemeeting.
appeared in 1801.5. There must be a clear question before the
A Massachusetts clerk of court, Luther S. Cushing,group for decision.
saw the need of a manual for non-legislative6. When the decision is being made, there must
bodies and produced his Manual of Parliamentarybe an opportunity to debate the question.
Practice: Rules of Proceeding and Debate in7. The question must be decided by taking a vote.
Deliberative Assemblies in 1845, but he left it to8. There must be a vote in the affirmative of at
each assembly to draft many rules specific to theleast a majority to make a decision or carry a
body. A military officer active in communityproposition.
affairs, Henry Martyn Robert saw a need for9. There must be no fraud, trickery or deception
additional standardization of practices amongcausing injury.
deliberative assemblies that would require less10. Decisions must not be in violation of laws,
time be devoted by each assembly to craftingrules, or decisions of higher authority.
rules specific to the body. He prepared the firstParliamentary procedure can safeguard rights,
edition of Robert's Rules of Order in 1876. Afterfacilitate democratic discussion, and get the
his death, a complete revision appeared asbusiness of the assembly done. As U.S. Supreme
Robert's Rules of Order Revised, the 4th edition.Court Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote, "The history
The next full revision appeared under the titleof liberty has largely been the history of
Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised, the 7thobservance of procedural safeguards.