Plato's Ideal City - Part 3 - The Problem With Democracy

Plato criticizes the democratic city because, hestill some parallels.
says, under this type of leadership, everyone isFew would argue that some of our public
free to do as he likes with no real respect forofficeholders seem grossly unqualified for the job.
authority. Consequently, this unbalances theIndeed, it seems that the main qualifications for a
stability of the Ideal State and makes it worse.politician to be elected today is a toothy smile, a
Plato goes on to say that the leaders in afirm handshake, and a line of rhetoric that will win
democratic city are not required to have anyover the voters. A brilliant example would be the
training at all. Their only qualifications lie in theirstrong showing of Ross Perot in the 1992
ability to make friends with the people. This pointPresidential race. If he had refrained from dropping
seems to lend to one of Plato's main themes inout and reentering, he may have actually had a
Book VIII of "The Republic", namely, that none ofchance to win-his only qualifications being a fat
the rulers in any of the regimes that he discusseswallet, shrewd business skills, and an endearing line
are enlightened rulers.of rhetoric.
It is hard to say that Plato does not have a pointWhile this does, indeed, seem scary, Plato's Ideal
here. Although the democratic city that heState probably seems even more scary to 21st
discusses is different from what we think ofcentury thinking. His city is far too suppressive
today when we think of democracy, there areand single-minded for today's way of thinking.