PEHP Position For Utah Health Insurance Reform

Judi Hilman, the executive director of the Utahthe risk of the group (the law allows a 30%
Health Policy Project (UHPP) recently opined thatdiscount for the healthiest groups and no more
the Public Employee Health Plan (PEHP) should bethan a 30% surcharge on the most expensive
available to all small businesses in Utah as a waygroups). Carriers price this way to provide
to make health insurance more affordable. Ms.affordable coverage for the youngest and
Hilman points out that "PEHP's claims costs arehealthiest folks. This helps pool the risk and
less than 4%, which compares favorably to themoderate premiums for all of us.
average claims costs for private insurers of 15If PEHP would try to implement their current
percent". (We assume she meant "administrative"underwriting model against the commercial
costs rather than "claims" costs.)underwriting model, they would attract only the
UHPP contends that by allowing PEHP to coversickest and oldest of the groups. This is not
small business in Utah, the cost of insurance wouldmerely a guess, but is a broadly accepted fact of
go down based on the lower administrative costs"field underwriting". If commercial carriers' prices
of PEHP, which would in turn allow more smallare geared towards the young and healthy and
businesses to offer health insurance to theirPEHP uses "one size fits all" pricing it will be an
employees. UHPP also reasons that by savingunmitigated disaster of the highest order for Utah
substantial amounts of money, PEHP can helptaxpayers.
subsidize the Children's Health Insurance Plan andBecause of this, we believe the UHPP proposal will
lower the uninsured population.result in exactly the opposite of what Ms. Hilman
Before we jump on the bandwagon of the UHPPpurports will happen; she said "PEHP will have the
proposal, let's look at the tough details. Let'sadvantage of including a younger healthier
consider the reasons that PEHP has 4%population in its risk pool, decreasing costs for all
administration costs compared with 15% costsbeneficiaries." In order to assume that, she must
with private carriers.believe that a younger population will join PEHP,
First, unlike commercial carriers, PEHP has no badwhose current risk pools include a slightly older
debt with customers. That is the advantage ofpopulation than found with small business. This
doing business with taxing entities. They never gocontention underestimates the power of pricing
out of business and if they run short of money,and its effect on the types of people that actually
they increase taxes. This is not so in the realenroll.
world of small business insurance. If a businessOn the other hand, if the plan is for PEHP to
can't pay - they seek protection undermimic the current commercial pricing model - then
bankruptcy - and under law, the carrier has towhat are we creating? The answer is; a
continue paying claims for 1 to 2 months withoutgovernment entity competing with private
collecting premium. That would be a shocking newbusiness - with taxpayers ready to bail out any
addition to PEHP's administrative costs.mistakes. This would not be consistent with
Next, PEHP has very low billing costs. That isfree-market ideals.
because their clients, state and local agencies, areFor PEHP to enter the small group market - with
limited in number and rarely change. Most of theirno experience - would be extremely risky for the
clients are large - like State employees and watertaxpayers of the State of Utah. Under law, the
districts. It will make a big difference in overheadState would have to make up any loses in their
to go from billing and reconciling scores of bills toblock of business. On the other hand, if PEHP
thousands of bills every month.made a "profit", it could not be shared with other
Additionally, PEHP also enjoys low marketing costs.blocks of business. The pool for State Employees
Currently the low number of potential PEHP clientsmust be kept separate from the Government
minimizes the need for a marketing department.Trust and the Children's Health Insurance Plan as
This will not be the case if they want to sell in thewell as the proposed new pool. Despite Ms.
small group market. PEHP will either need to hire aHilman's optimism, we could not subsidize CHIP
sales staff, or set up an 800 number and hopewith any savings from other PEHP pools.
businesses call them or they will need to payThe bottom line is this: PEHP does not have an
commission to agents. All of these marketinginternal cost advantage over the current carriers
solutions will cost a substantial amount of money.in the small group market. Their claims expenses
Finally but most importantly, PEHP lacks the staff(what they pay doctors, hospitals and
and infrastructure necessary to properlypharmacies) are about the same as and in many
underwrite small group cases on a large scale.cases more than the commercial carriers. They
Underwriting is the process of evaluating andwould not be able to serve the private small
pricing for risk, and developing underwritinggroup market for the same 4% overhead with
capability is an expensive proposition. Smallwhich they serve the government. They would
employers are an extremely price sensitivebe entering a treacherous market in which they
crowd. Health insurance is usually their second orhave no experience. The taxpayer would be at
third biggest expense - behind wages andrisk if things go wrong. Keep in mind that losses in
sometimes worker's compensation costs. A smallhealth insurance can be huge.
employer will change plans in a heartbeat if it theyAs a general philosophy, the Utah Association of
can find a better value. Price too low and you loseHealth Underwriters believes in a competitive
money. Price too high and your competitors takemarketplace. We are working hard to give Utah
your most profitable groups. If PEHP is to developemployers more choices and better information in
the department necessary to underwrite smallthe marketplace. We are in favor of expanding
employers on a large scale, it will incur substantialoptions in the private health care market. We
additional administrative overhead.support government and charitable subsidy of
Last year when UHPP first proposed that PEHPthose that need real help.
enter the small employer market to competeIf the legislature believes that it is worth asking
with commercial insurers, the most serious designPEHP to expand its mission, we would strongly
flaw had to do with the development of premiumrecommend a serious analysis of the underwriting
rating structures. PEHP is accustom to servingand marketing of plans before jumping into
clients that have composite rates (meaning oneunfamiliar waters. If UHPP's predicted outcomes
rate for all singles and one rate for all families) andare probable, then we would welcome the addition
community rates (all groups pay about the same).of PEHP into the small group marketplace, but the
Commercial small group rates are age-bandedtaxpayers should not be at risk for the losses of
(older employees pay more than younger) andPEHP as a competitor in the private market.