OECD Anti Corruption Unit

The good will that accompanied the 1997 Briberyexcessive commissions (bribes) paid in these deals.
Convention will not last ad infinitum. PerceptionsThe Cornerhouse Group rightly say that there is
that countries are not living up to their obligationsan urgent need to shift the focus of anti
under the Conventions will inevitability weaken thecorruption measures. In seeking to explain
agreement and lead to erosion of publiccorruption, most commentators tend to dwell on
confidence. Recuperating the momentum anddeveloping countries, not industrialised ones, on
enthusiasm of that initial accomplishment will gothe bribe takers not the bribe givers. The intimate
far to ensuring that it is not yet the end of theconnection between corruption in the South and
honeymoon.the institutional culture, bureaucratic practices and
International debate over good governance andpriorities of public and private institutions in the
best practice may work towards the bestNorth is thus effectively obscured
mechanism for investigating political and businessSome campaigners suggest that the best
corruption.deterrent for companies that have a propensity
There are many areas still in need of urgentto bribery and corruption would be an international
reform. The OECD convention, which has been soblacklist. The World Bank's current blacklist is a
effective in many ways, left loopholes. The needstart but it really only deals with some very small
to stop companies using political donations tofish. A blacklist that names and shames the big
briber foreign officials has to be outlawed.players, but more importantly prevents them
Some countries need to reform their laws so thatobtain international contracts would be a forceful
extra-territorial offences are included andstatement ? a landmark in the fight against
extradition is made easier.bribery and corruption.
Several International institutions have a long wayOther campaigners think that blacklists are often
to go. The World Bank and EU both need to carrycounterproductive. But the real deterrent for
out further reform to prevent bribery andthose who continue to bribe and corrupt is a real
corruption in programs they fund.fear of detection and prison. The only way for
On a broader agenda more research needs to bethe momentum of the anti-corruption movement
done in the way defence contracts involvingto continue is by the installation of tough
foreign countries are awarded. The US, Germany,investigation and prosecution authorities. Many
France and Britain are among the biggest armscountries in Western Europe and North America
sellers in the world. They are extremelyare yet to show that they are willing to
competitive. As these contracts usually involve anprosecute offenders. International Conventions
element of national government involvement arehave a effect but without real regulatory muscle
even more secretive than normal contracts. Yetthey will whither away and die.
the evidence we have indicates that there are still