Near-Term Prospects for a Lebanon-Israel Peace Treaty

On Sunday, August 20, 2006, Lebanon's Primepolitical realities, as the Shia and minority Alawites
Minister Fouad Siniora suggested that Israel, if ithave long cooperated against the Sunnis in Syria
'behaves wisely,' could be in a position to enterand Syria has aligned itself with Iran since 1980.
into a peace treaty with Lebanon. Don't scheduleSo long as Syria is positioned to exert significant
the celebrations just yet. Throughout the courseinfluence in Lebanon and the Shia remain steadfast
of its long history, the Middle East has been apartners in helping perpetuate the Alawite Ba'athist
graveyard for optimism. There, the promise ofgovernment in Damascus--and Iran could
peace has typically proved more illusory than aaccommodate Syria toward those ends--Syria
desert mirage. Therefore, the offer needs to belikely will not resist a de facto Caliphate. With Iraq
tested to determine if it is credible. Even if it is,being pulled in the direction of Iran despite the
major obstacles could still block the way to peacepresence of more than 100,000 American soldiers
between Lebanon and Israel.there, the regional balance of power is beginning
Prime Minister Siniora's willingness to pursue peaceto tilt more toward Iran and away from the
with Israel could be ascertained by determiningUnited States and West. That trend will tend to
whether he is willing to engage in direct andfurther deepen Iranian-Syrian cooperation.
unconditional negotiations with Israel aimed atAt a minimum, the Rejectionist group is likely to
reaching a bilateral peace treaty. Israel should testtry to harden any tough negotiating positions that
the Prime Minister's commitment to peace bymight be adopted by Lebanon. Following Egyptian
inviting him to Jerusalem for such talks.President Anwar Sadat's visit to Jerusalem, Syria
Afterward, rhetoric would have to give way toand the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)
diplomacy.launched a diplomatic offensive in the Arab world
If the Lebanese Prime Minister is serious aboutaimed at blocking the possibility of a separate
peace, the path to peace between Israel andpeace between Egypt and Israel. Later, at a
Lebanon is relatively uncomplicated in terms ofsensitive moment in the early stages of the
the substance involved. An agreement wouldEgyptian-Israeli peace process, Morocco's King
declare that the historic conflict between IsraelHassan praised Sadat's "firmness" against what he
and Lebanon is "finally terminated," provide for fulldescribed as "Israeli pretentions."
diplomatic relations between the two countries,If that does not impede progress, terrorists could
resolve the status of the disputed Shebaa Farmsinstigate a major terrorist attack or series of
area in creating a secure, recognized, and agreedattacks to sabotage the peace process. In March
border, provide for the disarming of Hezbollah and1978, the PLO seized a bus in Israel and killed 32
offer assurances that both parties would takeIsraelis on the eve of Israeli Prime Minister
responsibility to prevent attacks against the otherMenachem Begin's trip to the United States to
from being launched from their soil, and would endfurther the Egyptian-Israeli peace process. If such
any economic boycotts.attacks do little to abort the peace process, a
Nonetheless, uncomplicated as the path to peacecampaign of assassinations and car bombings
might be, a host of obstacles would likely makedirected at Lebanese leaders could be undertaken,
the peace process perilous. A glimpse at thosemuch as occurred during the early 1980s.
possible barriers is useful in assessing the near- orMoreover, Lebanon's Shia could be encouraged by
medium-term prospect for a peace treatyIran to seek a new governing relationship based
between Lebanon and Israel.on current demographic realities. Such a bid could
The Historic Arab Narrative:shatter Lebanon's delicate political structure and
The historic Arab narrative that sees Israel as anbring an end to any peace process that might be
"artificial" and "illegitimate" state could colorunderway.
attitudes against a bilateral peace agreement. TheRadical Palestinian groups such as Hamas and
bias could be tilted severely toward a prolongedIslamic Jihad, both of whose leaders are hosted
ceasefire that falls far short of peace and fullby Damascus, could seek to foment unrest
diplomatic relations.among Lebanon's Palestinian population. Lebanon's
In 1977, former Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Ebanpolitical leaders remain opposed to granting
explained, "...history is the enemy of thePalestinians full rights of citizenship, even those
Arab-Israeli reconciliation. The past is theborn in Lebanon. They fear that such an
adversary of the future. The vision that Arabsarrangement would upset the current sectarian
deduce form their history has never included thebalance upon which Lebanon's political and
idea of a Jewish sovereignty in the heart of theeconomic system rests. Hence, even if Lebanon
Middle East..." Such attitudes can be overcome toembraces a long-term goal for the resettlement
the extent that a bilateral peace treaty becomesof Palestinians in a Palestinian state, radical
possible, as they were in Egypt and Jordan.Palestinian leaders could still provoke such unrest
However, in a weak state with a weakto help block a possible peace treaty.
government, not to mention a fairly large shareEgypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia are likely to head
of the population that is radicalized, the effortup the Moderate camp. In no small part on
could prove much more daunting.account of those three states, the Arab League
Lebanon's Internal Dynamics:is already attempting to counter the money Iran
Lebanon rests on a fragile, often uneasy, balanceis providing to Hezbollah for Lebanon's
between diverse religious groups. The religiousreconstruction. "This is a war over the hearts and
balance continues to shift toward an increasingmind of the Lebanese, which Arabs should not
Muslim majority and a shrinking Christian minority.lose to the Iranians this time," a senior Arab
Muslims include Shia, Sunnis, and Druze. ChristiansLeague official explained. Concern over Iranian
include Maronites, Roman Catholics, and Greekhegemony could tend to erode the longstanding
Orthodox. As a result of its diverse population,Arab historical narrative, particularly as the
the Library of Congress' Country Study onModerate effort is led by two countries that have
Lebanon explains, "sectarianism (orentered into peace treaties with Israel.
confessionalism) is the dominant social, economic,Negotiating Obstacles:
and political reality. Divisiveness has come toThe biggest danger of a breakdown in
define that which is Lebanon... While Muslims andnegotiations would come from an attempt by
Christians have lived together in Lebanon for overLebanon to link a peace agreement to overall
a century, their deep disagreements over theMiddle East peace. With Syrian and Palestinian
Lebanese political formula and state make itdemands likely irreconcilable for the time being,
unrealistic to treat all Lebanese as members ofsuch linkage could only preclude a bilateral peace
one social unit... Lebanon's somewhat peculiaragreement between Lebanon and Israel. Syria
political system has reinforced sectarianwould seek to bring the Golan Heights into the
identification and consciousness." The report adds,calculus while radical Palestinian groups would seek
"Each sect has its own set of personal statusa "right of return" of all Palestinian refugees and
laws... The confessional system of personal-statustheir descendants to Israel. Both would greatly
laws strengthens the role of communal religiouscomplicate the diplomatic calculus and the latter
leaders and impedes the evolution of Lebanesedemand would be a "deal breaker."
nationalist or universalist secular ideas."In addition to linkage, Lebanon could seek the
These dynamics translate into a weakfulfillment of prior conditions before proceeding
government that might not be able to gainwith possible peace talks. Lebanon could seek that
sufficient public support to conclude a peaceIsrael turn over a portion of the disputed Shebaa
treaty with Israel. With the Shia population,Farms area to Lebanon as a gesture of good
radicalized by longstanding support from Syria andfaith. It could seek that Israel turn over control of
Iran, now comprising up to 45% of Lebanon'sthat area to the United Nations in advance. Early in
population, popular sentiment in Lebanon is likely tothe Egyptian-Israeli talks, Egypt demanded a
run against a peace treaty. The Christians aloneguarantee that Israel would commit in advance to
could not conclude such an agreement without theturning over all of the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt.
risk of a fresh civil war.Later, Egypt requested that Israel demonstrate
At the same time, Lebanon's internal dynamicsits commitment to peace by turning over the
also provide an ideal environment in which "stateWest Bank to Jordan and Gaza Strip to Egypt
within a state" entities can flourish. In the 1970s,before any agreement was reached. Afterward,
Palestinian terrorist groups enjoyed a large degreeEgypt sought a transfer of the town of El Arish
of autonomy and used Lebanon as a stagingas a "good faith" gesture. Historically, such
ground for cross-border terrorist attacks againstgestures have gone unrewarded in the Middle
Israel. From the late 1980s to the present,East. Most recently, Israel's unilateral withdrawal
Hezbollah has dominated south Lebanon andfrom the Gaza Strip in 2005 did little to mitigate
launched terrorist attacks against Israel fromterrorist attacks launched from there.
there. Fresh from what it perceives to have beenIn response to Sadat's demands, Begin replied,
a "victory" on account of the inconclusive"Nobody can get anything for nothing." At the
outcome from the recent combat between Israeltime, Prime Minister Begin's seeming "intransigence"
and Hezbollah, Hezbollah is not likely to be verywas widely criticized from within and outside
keen on efforts to bring about a bilateralIsrael. However, well before Sadat had made his
Lebanon-Israel peace accord. Furthermore, even ifdramatic trip to Israel, Israel had agreed to the
Hezbollah could be persuaded by Lebanon'sprinciple of withdrawal, but the extent and
Government to accept such a peace treaty,implementation of such a withdrawal depended on
breakaway factions or newly-formed radicalthe agreement to a peace accord, rather than
groups would likely have the ability to supplantanything less than a full peace e.g., a ceasefire or
Hezbollah in the absence of broad-basedtruce extension.
communal support for bilateral peace.Ultimately, Egypt moderated its stance and
Regional Geopolitics:dropped its demand for prior conditions. That
Lebanon is likely to remain an important piece of adevelopment led to the successful Camp David
growing geopolitical struggle between the MiddleSummit in 1978. The Summit led to a
East's forces of "Rejectionism" and "Moderation."breakthrough agreement that paved the way to
Such a battle could put further strains ona bilateral peace agreement the following year.
Lebanon's weak government and divisive society.Outlook for Lebanon-Israel Peace Treaty:
Iran and Syria will continue to spearhead theGiven the above background information, odds
Rejectionist element. Both have substantialappear to run strongly against the achievement of
influence with regard to Hezbollah. Syria still seesa bilateral Lebanon-Israel peace agreement in the
Lebanon as a historic part of "Greater Syria" andnear-term. Given the hazards of a weak
is vying to keep Lebanon within its sphere ofLebanese government, fragile sectarian balance
influence. Syria could well attempt to use Lebanoncoupled with Lebanon's changing demographics,
as a bargaining chip for pursuing its own demandsregional geopolitical situation that is arguably tilting
with Israel and avoiding increased diplomaticmore toward Iran, and possible procedural pitfalls,
isolation. A bilateral Lebanon-Israel peacethe obstacles are probably too great to
agreement would shrink the pool of the Middleovercome, particularly within the next 3-5 years,
East's "confrontation states" and weaken Syrianif not longer. Neither Egypt nor Jordan faced such
regional influence. An erosion of Syrian influencean array of barriers. Egypt was a strong state,
could exacerbate internal pressures for reformwas guided by a visionary risk-taking leader, and
within Syria.had the political capacity to break free of Arab
Iran sees Lebanon's Shia population as a naturalRejectionism. Jordan's King Hussein had enjoyed a
base for expanding its Islamic Revolution andlong period of behind-the-scenes cooperation with
building a de facto Shia Caliphate that includesIsrael and a strong relationship with the United
Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Iraq, Iran, and Lebanon, notStates, and those factors coupled with Egypt's
to mention incorporating Shia populations spreadpreviously breaking the taboo of recognizing
across other Middle Eastern states and beyond.Israel, greatly reduced the risks of his formalizing
Moreover, its role is not incompatible with Syria'speace with Israel.