McCain Declares Victory in Iraq

During his recent interview with pastor RickIraqi armed forces fully "stand up" to their own
Warren, Senator John McCain described Generaldefense Security of borders and absence of
David Petraeus as a "great leader. . .who took usterrorist sanctuaries Productive relations with
from defeat to victory in Iraq." Obviously, Generalneighbors Support for the United States Perhaps
Petraeus deserves all the acclaim he is usuallythese are the sum total of the kind of security
afforded by citizens and politicians alike for makingwe hope for in Iraq.
the Surge an effective strategy. The Surge,And, if we haven't quite achieved "victory," what
together with the Sunni Awakening and theis our strategy for doing so? We are now
stand-down by Shiite militias, have successfullywithdrawing Surge forces. Prime Minister Maliki has
reduced violence in Iraq. But what must haveagreed to some kind of time table withdrawal. We
surprised some is McCain's claim to have achievedhaven't heard of a new strategy from Senator
"victory" in Iraq. Previously, the Senator hasMcCain. Senator Obama's objectives are quite
repeatedly stated that he will never leave Iraqdifferent, obviously. This doesn't mean that
until US and Coalition forces had achievedObama is any less patriotic. He analyzes the
"victory." McCain has chided Senator Obama forproblem differently. And, we should note that
trading votes for victory, for wanting to leave"victory" may just be an outworn concept for
Iraq before we had a chance to win, thus notthis "war on terror." There will be no signing on
putting America first-something McCain claims hethe forward starboard main deck of the USS
will always do. Now, it seems as if we have doneMissouri as there was in Tokyo Bay on 2
exactly that-achieved "victory." Has McCainSeptember, 1945. There will be no Paris Peace
suddenly realized that we have achieved his endAccords that terminated the Vietnam conflict in
goal? We are left to wonder if we have, indeed,January, 1973. Whatever "victory" looks like it is
achieved "victory," what do we do now? What iscertain, as Petraeus and others have told us, it will
our exit strategy? Did he mean that the Surgebe achieved not only by military power but the
has "worked"? And that now we must move onforce of diplomacy, discussions, the very hard
toward "victory"? Or did he simply mis-speak? Didwork of reaching agreements amongst disparate
he, perhaps, mean to use a different verbgroups and power sources. So, Senator McCain,
tense-not "took us to victory" but rather "ishave we indeed achieved "victory" or are we still
leading us toward victory."working toward it with a strategy you and others
If the latter be the case, what then constituteshave not clearly articulated? The key to
"victory" in Iraq? The Administration is alwayspreserving our democracy is to continually ask
speaking about "the facts or conditions on thepoliticians important questions about policy,
ground." So what are those conditions or factsphilosophy and performance. We must, as Dr.
that warrant declaring victory? Perhaps theySally Ride has said of a NASA manager, be
include some or all of the following: Numbers of"inquisitive to a fault." We must keep asking
casualties Binding agreements amongst Shia, Sunniserious questions of all who would be in
and Kurd Viable oil sharing laws Conducting futuregovernment-questions about philosophy, priorities
elections Using oil resources to fund reconstructionand, especially, performance. This is our only
Functioning of civic organizations-free press,guard against the tyranny of a few, our only
keeping schools open, viable market place andmeans of preserving our democracy.
availability of electricity, water, sewage Having