Human Resources - The Talent Intelligence of Accountability For Others

Management has been described as one type of- Available resources
leadership where managers, supervisors to even- Abilities of the employees
C Suite executives achieve results through theWhen people demonstrate high talent intelligence
efforts or actions of others. These individuals thenfor this attribute of accountability for others they
become accountable for those whom theywill not make excuses or blame others for poor
manage. Performance appraisals are then basedperformance. These individuals will look to identify
upon whether the corporate initiatives, objectives,the why behind the less than desirable
targets, or goals (call them what you will) wereperformance as well as any repetitive obstacles
achieved.keeping the employee or employees from
So being accountable for others is a talent andachieving the desired results.
surprisingly enough can be measured. ThisConversely, people who demonstrate low talent
measurement, for all extent and purpose, couldintelligence place their emphasis on less sustainable
be called talent intelligence.efforts such as appearance and image instead of
The next step is defining exactly what isresults and successful outcomes. Consequently,
accountability for others. Several instrumentsthey blame others for the inability to secure the
available for organizations including humanobjectives because they lack a positive self
resources and sales departments that assessimage. These folks who lack this talent also may
performance all have slightly different definitions.find protecting their own personal self image more
However the essence of all these definitionsimportant achieving the results.
resides within the ability for a leader to beHuman resource professionals also need to
responsible for the behaviors which are theidentify the behaviors behind the expectations
consequences of the actions of those theywhen discussing this talent of being accountability
managed. To be responsible suggests that thesefor others. Those demonstrations might include:
individuals in their respective leadership roles- Confirming delegated action has been properly
cannot engage in the blame game.received
Many of use are familiar with managers who- Providing honest, timely, constructive feedback
blame others or something else for not achieving- Defining (clearly) the expectations for the job,
the results or the organization. These individualsproject or process
lack an internal responsibility and potentially lackOf course to compute the intelligence suggests
personal accountability as well unless the culture ofcombining both the scores of the outside
the company prohibits them from takingassessment and then the performance appraisal.
responsibility.The sum of these scores should give the
Additionally accountability for others suggest theorganization a fairly accurate and solid number
ability to accurately evaluate the:about this talent of accountability for others.
- Task at hand