Health Insurance Plan Reform Lawsuit Arguments Begin

This week, opening arguments begin in a Floridalegislation for two reasons. The first is that this
courtroom for the highly publicized healthcareparticular provision (the health insurance plan
reform lawsuit. Over 20 states contend that themandate) does not take effect until 2014; until
Obama administration's legislation is unconstitutional.then, it would be premature for any party to
Specifically, they believe that the individualprove harm.
mandate provision--which requires most people toIn addition, they contend that it will be individual
either buy a health insurance plan or pay ataxpayers, not state governments, that will be
fine--violates the 10th Amendment of thedirectly impacted. Therefore, the responsibility
Constitution, which states that all powers notrests on those individuals to file legal challenges. A
expressly given to the federal government arehandful of individuals have already taken that to
left to the states.heart, including Matt Sissel, who wrote a widely
Over the decades, there have been varyingcirculated op-ed piece about his decision. Sissel's
interpretations of that amendment. Although theseperate lawsuit is currently pending in federal
idea of federalism is generally upheld, the nationalcourt, and may have more of a chance of
government has been allowed more leeway in itssucceeding.
actions. The current administration is hoping thatLed by conservative lawyers David Rivkin and
the judge will support a loose construction of theLee Casey, parties to the main lawsuit claim that
constitution. Their lawyers' goal is to get thethey are experiencing negative impacts now. For
lawsuit thrown out, on the grounds that theexample, the Small Business Legal Center (part of
commerce clause of the Constitution allows forthe National Federation of Independent
the federal government to regulate actions thatBusinesses) states that anticipation of the
affect commerce across state lines. They alsoupcoming changes have resulted in higher costs
point to the general welfare clause of thatand smaller businesses being forced to give up
document as justification.their health insurance plan.
Moreover, federal attorneys claim that the statesMost likely, the Pensacola judge will escalate the
in question--most with Republican attorneyissue to the Supreme Court. Afterward, those
generals--lack the standing to challenge thenine justices will be watched very carefully.