Health Care Reform - The Case Against Obama Care

Candidate Obama promised to bring a "changeincentives for doctors to treat patients according
you can believe in" to Washington politics and theto good medicine protocols. A doctor who refuses
way government has been doing business forto take a Medicare patient because of poor
decades. These main two selling points broughtreimbursement is in fact raising the cost for that
him into the White House. One year later,patient when he becomes too ill and seeks care in
fair-minded liberals as well as conservatives wouldthe emergency room. A secondary effect is that
admit he failed in either one miserably.doctors are getting out of the field that has not
Failure to succeed on a promise would give anyprovided a satisfying career of practicing medicine
President a bad grade; but in failing to bringfor the patient. Fewer doctors means less care
change into Washington politics, and hence get hiswhich in term means poorer health outcomes
health care agenda passed in the middle of atherefore higher costs. It is a vicious circle that
democratically well controlled House and Senate,can only be stopped with sensible reform. The
President Obama displayed an inexcusablesame goes for Medicaid. Poor management and
performance, one that in a competitive, profitreimbursement induces massive inefficiencies and
maximizing corporation would have cost him hisskyrocketing costs. In the end, it is the patient
job by now. The reason his failure is so profoundthat suffers and who in tern adds to ever rising
has to do with his luck of understanding of thecosts and more inefficiencies.
key components of the problem at hand. The luckOne way to fix Medicare is to continue the
of understanding of these fundamentalexisting privatization that allows private companies
components at this time of economic uncertainty,to compete and the patient to bear some of the
begs the need to question Mr. Obama'sresponsibility. Our research has shown that the
inexperience in governing, as well as his inability todoughnut hole may indeed be a black hole that
recognize the issues at hand towards deciding oninduces patients to switch or avoid therapy
a course of action and bringing forward sensiblealtogether, which in tern produces poor outcomes
arguments that people can believe in.and hence higher costs. However, if the model is
With regards to healthcare reform, the issuesrevised the patient can still bear some of the
Americans are faced with go beyond covering thefinancial responsibility and hence use the system
uninsured and bringing shame to insurancewiser, but he is not faced with such a catastrophe
companies. Certainly the above have to be dealtto be making unwise treatment decisions.
with but the health care issue is not a poor man'sThe uninsured pool is made of two cohorts. The
prerogative. Every family, from poor to middlepoor and the...not so poor who are willing, or
class is faced with exorbitant health insuranceforced to game the system. The two uninsured
costs while at the same time incremental healthgroups are:
benefits have not kept up with technological1. Uninsured because of poverty, and
progress, hence have not been realized. It is not2. Uninsured because the proposed legislation
unusual for a middle class family to be paying onewould allow one to game the system by avoiding
third of its income on health insurance only to be(high cost) insurance and only paying for it on the
asked to also pay co-pays, coinsurance costs, etc.way to the hospital
At the same time, it is clear that the existingInstead of forcing people to buy insurance (by
reimbursement system has stifled technologicalimposing a penalty which silly enough is less than
innovation in medicine and diseases like cancer,the cost of insurance), incentives should be
HIV, etc., are still around after decades ofprovided to induce wise and parsimonious
expenditures in research and investment in humanutilization of resources. People are not criminals
capital. Relative speaking, when it comes to healthand should not be treated as such by imposing
care the US is the most technologically advancedsevere fees/penalties to induce them to a certain
nation, but nationally, we have been making babybehavior; in general, people act wisely and will
steps in terms of dealing with serious illnesses.always seek behavior that seems fair for the
So what is the way out of this mess or the bestbenefit received. Health accounts that are set
way to fix "the problem" in health care? For oneaside to use in time of need should not be "use it
thing we have to accept the fact that this is aor lose it" types; after all, who wants to set aside
"universal" issue and not an issue just for the poorthousands of dollars per year, on top of insurance
and uninsured. Not accepting this as the mainpremiums, just to cover an emergency that may
problem and trying to fix the issue by pouringnever occur? I know of many people who think
dollars indiscriminately -over one trillion ofthis is insane and counterproductive.
government debt, is not only unwise but ratherThe proposed legislation approved by Congress is
irresponsible as well. One has to recognize the bigbasically dead and members of Congress, be it
cost components that contribute to this problemrepublicans or democrats, have been
and deal with all of them. The big components are:disassociating themselves from it. The truth of
1. Medicare & Medicaidthe matter is, these proposals were concocted
2. Reimbursement and patient responsibilitybehind closed doors, with brides and kickbacks
3. Consumer cost and incentives for betterand no one can trust them. For a bi-partisan
utilization of health resourcesproposal and a change people can believe in, the
4. Uninsuredexisting proposals should be thrown out and new
Medicare reform is necessary in order to provideones should begin from scratch.