Have We Achieved Our Objectives in Iraq?

Exactly where are we in this conflict? It's difficultof massive proportions.
to cut through to the truth with so much hot airIraq does have a democratic government, a
coming from all sides. I decided to go back andparliamentary system where the people vote for
read the Joint Resolution approved October 2002their representatives, who join together in political
by the President and the Senate authorizing theparties and elect a Prime Minister. As described in
invasion or liberation (take your pick) of Iraq.Wikipedia, a permanent 275-member Iraqi National
It begins with a bunch of whereas clausesAssembly was selected in a general election in
summarizing the then current situation: Iraq hadDecember 2005, initiating the formation of a new
been kicked out of Kuwait and had agreed not togovernment. The Prime Minister of Iraq is Nouri
develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons,al-Maliki, who holds most of the executive
and Iraq would not support terrorism; weaponsauthority and appoints the cabinet. The current
inspectors had been forced to withdraw in 1998President of Iraq is Jalal Talabani, who serves
and Congress had declared that Iraq's continuedlargely as a figurehead, with few powers. The
development of weapons of mass destructionvice presidents are Tariq al-Hashimi and Adel
threatened world peace; the Iraqi regimeAbdul Mehdi, deputy leader of SCIRI, the largest
continued to brutalize its civilian population; Iraqparty in the Iraqi National Assembly.
showed its hostility toward the United States byAlthough the government at times seems
attempting to assassinate Bush 41 and shoot atineffective, it is an honest democracy. It remains
US planes enforcing the no-fly zone; members ofto be seen if additional democracies will be
al Qaida are known to be in Iraq; the regimeestablished across the Middle East.
continues to harbor other terrorist organizations;The US-led coalition has freed the people of Iraq
Iraq might launch a surprise attack on the US orfrom Saddam's brutal dictatorship, and the new
provide weapons of mass destruction togovernment is not oppressive. However, a violent
terrorists.Sunni/al Qaida insurgency has continued to murder
Therefore, the Joint Resolution authorized thethousands in an effort to plunge the nation into
President to use the Armed Forces of the Unitedchaos and civil war. The US-led Surge, actually an
States as he determines to be necessary andincrease in troops and a change in strategy, has
appropriate in order to:splintered the insurgency and reduced the
(1) defend the national security of the Unitedviolence. Although the war is moving in the right
States against the continuing threat posed bydirection, Iraq is still a dangerous country, both for
Iraq; andthe Iraqis and US troops.
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations SecurityThe elimination of Saddam's regime removed a
Council Resolutions regarding Iraq.dangerous enemy without question. However, the
A review of this document indicates the US hadinsurgency is equally dangerous. If our enemies
several objectives, at least initially, in the warare able to win in Iraq, they may be able to
against the Iraqi regime.spread their hatred of the US beyond the borders
+ To eliminate weapons of mass destructionof Iraq and across the region.
stockpiled or under development by Iraq as calledThere is no hard evidence that Saddam was
for by various UN resolutions.working with international terrorist groups. There
+ To implement democracy within Iraq andappears to be some contact between al Qaida
eventually throughout much of the Middle East.and Saddam's regime, but no evidence of any
+ To free the people of Iraq from a brutaltype of alliance. It may be that the US was
dictatorship.concerned about the potential for an alliance, given
+ To eliminate a dangerous enemy.that both Saddam and al Qaida hate us.
+ To prevent Saddam Hussein from working withIraqi oil production is about 2.5 million bpd, about
international terrorist groups that might threatenwhere it was before the war. However, the oil is
the US.being sold by a friendly government, so we don't
Although not specified in the Iraq War Resolution,have to worry it will be used as a weapon.
it seems clear to me that the US was intent onTo summarize, we have removed the yoke of
making sure that control of Iraqi oil was takendictatorship from the people of Iraq and
from Saddam and turned over to a friendly Iraqiimplemented a democratic, if somewhat
government. Removing Saddam also eliminated hisineffective, national government. After years of
threat to Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and other oil richwarfare with extremists, the Surge seems to be
Middle East nations.leading to a better life for Iraqis. We have also
As everyone knows, we did not discoverremoved an enemy from Iraq, and secured a
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Althoughsupply of oil. All good things, clearly. On the other
there are rumors that these weapons werehand, no weapons of mass destruction were
shipped out of Iraq shortly before the invasion, nofound, and the ties between Saddam and
hard evidence supports this theory. Therefore,terrorists were not threatening. And we paid a
we must conclude that there were no weaponsheavy price in blood and national treasure.
of mass destruction in Iraq during the days leadingWas it worth it? Each of us will have to make
up to the war. It appears there was a massivethat assessment.
intelligence failure not only in the US, but in manyIf you would like to learn more about my ideas,
other nations as well. Some have claimed that theplease visit my website. It's informative and
Bush administration knew all along that there wereentertaining. Order Unholy Domain or PeaceMaker
no such weapons in Iraq, but this claim isn'tat Amazon.
justified with evidence. Basically, it was a screw-up