GOVERNMENT CONTROL OVER PROFESSIONAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

ign="center">would be unfair to apply the same rules and
For over a decade, there has been growingregulations to both aided and unaided professional
concern that opportunities for higher education toinstitutions. While the unaided institutions are
the weaker/minority sections of the society areentitled to autonomy in administration, they
rapidly getting eroded. The persistence ofcannot disregard the principle of merit. However,
inequities is manifest in local and regional disparitiesadmission of students to unaided educational
of access, gender discrimination, non-affordableinstitutions viz., Schools, Under Graduate, Post
fee structures, confusing eligibility requirements,Graduate colleges, where the scope for
bewildering admission procedures, reducedmerit-based selection is practically nil.
government support, unabashed commercialIt would be therefore permissible for the
practices, and lack of socially sensitiveUniversity or the Government, at the time of
government policies on higher education. Moregranting recognition, to require a private unaided
opportunities are available to the urban populationinstitution to provide for merit-based selection
and those with higher economic status.while at the same time giving the management
Since the days of Kerala Education Bill case, theresufficient discretion in admitting students. This can
has been much controversy on the constitutionalbe done through various methods.
dimension of minority rights to set up institutionsHere again the reality is that capitation fee is the
of higher education, catering to religious andmain criterion. While many private professional
linguistic minorities. While, St. Xavier’s case,institutions that have been conferred the status
which held the field for a long time, the situationof Deemed Universities in recent years enjoy
underwent a change after Unnikrishnan case. Butfreedom from governmental interference. Most of
now, after TMA Pai Foundation case the entirethem have disregarded the principles of
jurisprudence has been changed.transparency and non-commercialisation.
Under Article 30(1) of the Indian Constitution,It is for the Central Government or State
religious and linguistic minorities have the right toGovernment(s), in the absence of a Central
establish and administer educational institutions oflegislation, to come out with a detailed well
their own choice. The use of the words “ofthought out legislation on the subject. The
their own choice” indicates that evenCommittees that regulating the admission
professional educational institutions would beprocedure and fee structure shall continue to
covered under Article 30.exist, but only as a temporary measure and
It is to be agreed that education, now occupiesinevitable passing phase until the Central
the centre-stage of jurisprudence and for a longGovernment or the State Government(s) are
time to come, will remain an “occupation” orable to devise a suitable mechanism and appoint a
“business” rather than a welfare activity ofcompetent authority.
national importance. Of course the new view ofThere is no doubt that State should withdraw
private education with profit making incentives isfrom creating conditions, where the humbler
necessity. This is in terms with the Worldhumans have an equal opportunity for higher
Bank’s Privatisation Policy or Philosophyeducation. Secularism is the basic concept of the
that State should withdraw from the field ofConstitution and this is no longer in doubt. The
education. The TMA Pai verdict virtually opens theidea of giving some special rights to theminorities
constitutional door wide to the private unaidedis not to have a kind of a privileged or pampered
educational institutions.section of the population but to give to right to
Private education is one of the most dynamic andthe minorities a sense of security and feeling of
fast growing segments of post secondaryconfidence.
education at the turn of the twenty-first century.It appears doubtful if governments would be
A combination of unprecedented demand forwilling to undertake any of these measures. It is
access to higher educational institution and inabilityan open secret that the professional institutions
or unwillingness of government to provide theengaged in undesirable commercial practices are
necessary support has brought the private higherowed or control by powerful persons. Many are
educational institutions to theforefront. Privatemajor donors to political campaigns. However a
higher educational institutions, with long history inlimited power of regulation is still vested in
many countries, are expanding in scope andgovernment, which is welcome.
number, and are becoming increasingly importantReport this article
in parts of the world that relied almost entirely onThis article is copyright
the public sector. It is well established all over theSource:
world that those who seek professional education
must pay for it.
Taking notice of the cost of infrastructure andAsk a Question About this Article
better amenities, the requirements of the>> Certificate in foreign languages (
competitive world, and role of economic forces,Russian).where can I obtain it?
the Pai Foundation judgment holds that, the>> What is Spanish for
decision on the fee to be charged must>> Wat is the current racial data on
necessarily be left to the private educationalstudents of the New York City Public Schools?
institutions that doesn’t depend or seek>> Are you ready foy the Collapse of
upon any funds from the government.Capitalism ?
The very same judgment also stated that, it