Giddens and Blair - Liquidating Social Democracy

The Liquidationist Agendasocialism which envisaged a gradual cultural
Gazing around the world today, the 'old' socialstruggle for socialism rather than a Bolshevist
democracy appears to be dying, while some claiminsurrectionary seizure of power. Such strategies,
that a 'new' social democracy is struggling to bein turn, led into the Eurocommunist movement,
born. All over the developed world there seemsand the radical political economy movement of
to have arisen a new paradigm: one characterisedBritish Labour in the 70s, spearheaded by the likes
by an unprecedented narrowing of the politicalof Stuart Holland. The Swedish model of socialism,
field, whereby what little choice offered to votersepitomised by democratic wage earner funds,
boils down to either neo-liberalism, or otherwisesaturation levels of unionization and a universalistic
'neo-liberalism with a human face'. Amidst all thiswelfare state, can also be seen as part of this
upheaval no individual has so come to epitomisenow neglected radical 'Third Road'. The old politics
the political moment as has British Prime Minister,of the 'Third Road' concerned themselves with
Tony Blair. Indeed, Blair and prominent Britishfundamental (ie: qualitative) social change. They
sociologist, Anthony Giddens have emerged asconcerned themselves with the democratization
the Siamese twins of the 'New Labour' newof the economy and the state apparatus. They
order, one presenting the 'face' of 'New Labour' tosought to counter the ever growing power of
world, the other turning from otherwise fruitfulmonopoly capital with selective socialization,
explorations of social theory to become the primecollective capital mobilization and redistribution,
source of intellectual legitimation for what hasindustry plans and global solidarity. They pursued
come to be termed as 'The Third Way'.full employment, media diversification, and
This 'Third Way', as theorised by Giddens anduniversal provision of education and health care.
practiced by Blair, claims to steer a course halfThey sought reforms, backed through massive
way in between traditional social democracy andcultural and social mobilization, which would deliver
neo-liberalism. Giddens has referred to this as 'thequalitative change. Exploding the tradition
renewal of social democracy' and the 'radicalopposition of reform and revolution, they sought
centre'. The name of the first chapter of Giddens'reforms of truly revolutionary dimensions.
highly influential book, 'The Third Way' says it all.Unfortunately, this radical challenge of the Left
Titled 'After Socialism', the implication is obvious.came to a head during the early 1980s, ending in
(Giddens, p 3) Socialism, according to Giddens,bitter defeat. The French Socialists stalled after an
therefore, is dead, and traditional social democracyoriginal burst of success.
shares with it a common grave. If these traditionsSwedish Prime Minister, Olaf Palme was
enjoy anything of an afterlife, Giddens setsassassinated and the radical Meidner wage earner
himself the task of efficiently exorcising thosefunds were capped at 10% of the stock
troubling ghosts. Ideology, by this reckoning is alsoexchange. Meanwhile, British Labour effectively
dead, not in the Marxian sense, but in the senseself-destructed. And while the Hawke-Keating
that capitalism has come to be considered anLabor governments were happy to impose wage
absolute: invisible and impervious to criticism.restraint upon unions, commitments on extending
The 'Third Way' programme advocated bythe social wage soon evaporated into thin air.
Giddens as an alternative to these allegedlyThe 'death knell' of socialism was proclaimed by
defunct traditions is at once politically 'safe' and, inmany with the collapse of the USSR. This theme,
many ways, populist. 'Cosmopolitanism', 'welfarerepeated like a mantra throughout the media, and
modernisation', and a vague concept of 'socialeven through ostensibly 'left' journals, led to total
inclusion' (Giddens, p 69) comprise its core. Whatdemoralisation and the collapse of radical
is more, despite a supposed commitment toalternatives.
'double democratisation', democracy is notablyUnderstanding the moment better than their
absent from the economy, the unquestionedopponents, Blair and his ilk cynically exploited the
dominance of globalising capital being taken as amodern fascination with 'intellectual fashion' and
given which is 'not to be questioned'. In the spherewhat we might refer to as the 'cult of the new'.
of the economy, Blair's strategy is very revealing:Thus 'New' Labour was born and, along with it, the
resembling an attempt to neutralise Thatcherismostensibly 'new' Third Way ideology. Finding eager
by internalising rather than negating it. 'Thesupporters of his programme for ideological
forward march of labour', therefore, has notliquidation in the British media, Blair and New
recommenced. British Labour is not only on theLabour were swept into office. Before too long
defensive: it is in a state of ideological liquidation. Inalready despairing leftists were treated to the
'New Labour-speak' this is called 'claiming thespectacle of Tony Blair admitting his support for
Centre'. Of course, what remains unsaid in thiselements of the Thatcherite agenda. Into this
little populist quip is that 'the Centre' is alwayspotentially dangerous ground, however, moved
relative. Those with real power do not have toGiddens, pacifying those pseudo-intellectual middle
'claim' the Centre - they define it.class Labour supporters with his now-famous
Additionally, the kind of 'reciprocity in welfare'tour-de-force, 'The Third Way - The Renewal of
urged by Giddens has led, ultimately, to punitiveSocial Democracy'. At once promising everything
welfare. Clinton's support of a two year limit onand nothing, Giddens argued a means of 'social
welfare payments stands in stark contrast to hisdemocratic renewal' which, in reality, facilitated the
failure to secure meaningful health care reform.liquidation of the very tradition it claimed to
Such issues are adroitly evaded by Giddens,invigorate.
presumably out of artifice, not ignorance.Alternatives to Liquidation
According to Giddens, "the issue isn't moreIt is a sign of the utter lack of direction of the
government or less, but recognising thatmodern Left in Australia, Britain and elsewhere,
governance must adjust to the newthat some of its leading spokespeople are now
circumstances of the global age." (Giddens, p72)openly embracing Giddens's 'Third Way'. There is,
This is 'code' for 'downsizing' government as parthowever, an alternative. That alternative is to
of the overall global process by which thereturn to the radical principles of the original 'Third
capitalist economy has been radically restructured.Road' movements, resurrecting the radical critique
The relation between 'social inclusiveness' andof monopoly capitalism, and reinitiating the debate
small government, where 'small government' canon economic democracy. That alternative is to
no longer afford the most basic of infrastructure,reassert the principles of universalism insofar as
let alone the support of vibrant and equitablethey apply to the social democratic welfare state,
public education and health systems, is terrain thatto capture and radicalize the debate on citizenship,
is also conveniently untraversed.and to posit the possibility of socialist globalization
(nb: the cost of this is evident, for instance, in theas an alternative to globalizing capital. That
Victorian Citylink private tollway project, whichalternative is to pursue an intellectual renaissance
cost $2b to build, but will cost motorists awithin the Left, with the aim, once more, of
staggering $4 billion before reverting to publicsetting the agenda rather than responding to it.
ownership)That alternative is to start encouraging
Although Giddens portrays his 'Third Way' as newco-operation and exchange across the arbitrary
and topical, its combination of authoritarianism andboundaries of social movements and political
pseudo-liberalism is far from new. Far fromparties, this with the aim of building what Gramsci
representing 'the renewal of social democracy',called a 'counter hegemonic historic bloc': a broad
the politics advocated by Giddens and his eagersocial/political alliance capable of making effective
student, Tony Blair marks its liquidation. Strippedcultural interventions, and winning qualitative
of its commitment to the socialized mixedchange.
economy, economic democracy, a radicallyThe world has changed since the Left's last great
redistributive welfare state and justly progressiveworldwide political defeat.
taxation, there is nothing left to distinguish socialIt will take hard work and determination to
democracy from liberalism.reclaim a viable alternative agenda that goes
Despite its flaws, however, the kind of agendabeyond ingenuous liquidationism. It will take a
advocated by Giddens and Blair has ancultural struggle with the aim of reclaiming the
undoubtable appeal for those who prefer to retainLeft's identity and language. It means responding
a sense of social responsibility without any of theto the reality of globalizing capital, but without
more controversial political commitmentsmistaking this process as 'natural', 'unstoppable' or
necessary to bring reality into line with rhetoric.'without agency'. It means revising leftist theory
Third Ways - Old and Newto take account of new realities, without
Before the collapse of the Soviet Union, the termabandoning the radical values or content which
'third way' referred usually to those pathswere always at its core. The possibility of a
between Bolshevism and Right social democracy.counter-hegemonic response is real. It just
The Italian Communist Party, for instance,remains to be seen whether the Left is up to the
pioneered the 'Third Road' ('Terza Via') totask.