'Enforcing Compliance' - The Missing Link to Corporate Governance

Parmalat, BCCI and Maxwell are examples ofalways the norm at Annual General Meetings. But
major corporate failures that shocked the worldhalf a loaf is better than none, it is said. Not all the
prior to the inception of corporate governance inmistakes and loopholes could be plugged overnight
the 1980s. However, since the corporate scandalbut communications should as usual be a two-way
of Enron, corporate governance has broughtaffair, continuous and all concerns by stakeholders
about increased attention amongst regulators andshould be followed and investigated by
all stakeholders world over particularlyindependent bodies.
shareholders, banks and governments. ThisEnron and its executives have contributed large
concern has resulted in a focus on the relationshipsums of money to some politicians. Enron created
between a company's shareholders and its Boarda culture in which financial instruments was
of directors, as well as the executive anddesigned to turn profits into losses and taxes into
non-executive directors.tax shelters. Excessive risk was the word. It was
Regarded as leadership in the corporate sense,different with Next. It conducts a weekly "Next
corporate governance is meant to assistBrand trading meeting" which considers the
companies to manage and control risk processesperformance and development of the Next Brand
within an organisation.through its different distribution channels. All
Inferred from its definition, corporate governancebusiness aspects of risk management in respect
need to be more pragmatic in its operationsof the Next Brand including sales, property,
ensuring that the company conforms to the lawsproduct, systems, warehousing and personnel also
and regulations.considered here. Key performance indicators are
The corporate governance structure specifies themonitored daily and weekly to help to keep in
distribution of rights and responsibilities amongcheck all aspects of risk. To Next, risk
different participants in the corporation, such as,management was part of their organisational
the board, managers, shareholders and otherculture.Next's Board is responsible for the Group's
stakeholders, and spells out the rules andrisk management process. It has delegated
procedures for making decisions on corporateresponsibility for implementation of the risk
affairs. This is usually not the norm. Enron'smanagement process to the Chief Executive and
demise as a result of its excessive risks, conflictsenior management best qualified in each area of
of interest and poor accountability on the part ofthe business. The Board sets guidance on the
its directors, does not seem to have scared othergeneral level of risk.
organisations. Recent events in organisations areNext's conduct or operations in the board room
not anything to write home about. Corporateshould be emulated. Corporate governance should
governance is meant to govern not to be usedbe a continuous process and all
as a witch-hunting exercise. However, the waystakeholders-focused. It should not discriminate
things happen in the board room, corporateand should be regularly reviewed by an external
governance needs to be tightened if it can bringbody appointed by shareholders in consultation
about the change so much needed at this time.with the board so that they do not take over the
By the directors confirming that the companyresponsibilities of the board.
accounts comply with requirements in theThe Next's Board takes care not to disseminate
Company Act, they become accountable to theinformation of a share price sensitive nature which
entire stakeholders and responsible foris not available to the market as a whole. On the
safeguarding their assets and other of the Groupother hand share performance-related pay
and hence for taking reasonable steps for thecontributed to Enron's demise by pushing the
prevention of fraud and other irregularities. Enron'sexecutives to announce non-existent profits
conduct indicated that its directors were not reallythrough the special purpose entities to deceive
complying. To date, there is increasing acceptancethe market in order to keep its stock price high
that in spite of legal duties remaining solely toto enable them receive their fat pay. They paid
shareholders, there is the view for companies tothemselves huge salaries as a result.
be more accountable to other stakeholdersThis practice is still continuing all over the globe;
including workers. Even though this view is beingand was mainly part of the current recession.
challenged both in America and the U.K,There is no doubt that Boards of companies
shareholders still want to wield more powers toshould be made to live up to their responsibilities.
maintain their investment. This is evident in theWith Next's corporate governance, one could see
recent demonstrations by shareholders describingthat the main responsibilities lie with the Board. For
directors as 'fat cows'.example, the system of internal control and
Considering the relevant principles missed bymajor policy decisions as well as the Group's risk
Enron in its operations in comparison with Next, itmanagement are the responsibilities of the board;
is gainsaying the fact that some of the mistakeswho in turn delegates these responsibilities to the
Enron made are still going on in someCEO and senior management best qualified in each
organisations around the globe-unnecessaryarea of the business.
risk-taking; performance-related pay schemesThe Board at Next acknowledged that its primary
including share options to Executives with therole is to represent and promote the interests of
non-executive directors sitting aloof doing nothing.shareholders; is accountable to shareholders for
Enron's Board's compensation committee refusedthe performance and activities of the Group and
to ask any question about the award of salaries,communicates with its shareholders in respect of
perks, annuities, life insurance and rewards to thethe Group's business activities through its annual
executive members at a critical point in the life ofReport and accounts, yearly and half yearly
Enron. Sir Goodwin's recent pension saga is aannouncements and regular trading updates to the
recent case in point. It leaves a sour taste in thestock exchange. Enron's board of directors were
mouth of all stakeholders to see that 'simple''busy' trying to mislead tax authorities in order to
things to be done to salvage 'huge' losses orcollect $87m from creating tax shelters. A little
scandals are clearly overlooked may be due toover the top maybe, but little drops of water
familiarity which breeds contempt, anyway.make a mighty ocean. Enron could have avoided
The temptation to be 'bought' with money is soall those mess if it had listened, complied and
strong that the idea of independent executiveenforced the rules to the letter instead of bending
directors serving on a board is not having thethem to suit their whims And caprices. The
impact it was expected to have as they all easilyBusiness Roundtable emphasised that in planning
get caught up in the scandal in the long run. All thecommunications with shareholders and investors,
so-called independent committees, directors, andcompanies should consider never misleading or
auditors were there to bring checks and balancesmisinforming shareholders about the corporation's
yet they failed shareholders.operations or financial condition. This was lack of
People were just doing anything they want.business ethics.
Suffice to say that the onus of the matter is thatEnron appears to be 'an accident waiting to
the culture of the organisation should be linkedhappen'. Enron's internal controls had been very
with individual values and channelled to what theweak as a matter of fact. When an employee
organisation is expected to do in its corporatewrote a memo about the CEO, Ken Lay; he
rules and regulations. This could in no doubt go ahimself handled the matter internally by appointing
long way to stamp out the bad nuts from thea law firm which has a long association with Enron
corporate board rooms.to investigate the matter. Auditors, lawyers and
Enron created partnerships with shell companiesindependent directors should be seen to be totally
or subsidiaries known as special purpose entitiesindependent as outlined in the relevant regulations
(SPEs), enabling them to keep hundreds of millionsand laws. They should not be allowed to dabble in
of dollars in debt off its books, overstate andthe company's affairs where they have any
understate debt due to some very looseinterest. This must be seen to be enforced.
accounting rules. The Directors of Next plc on theThe main lesson to learn from Enron's experience
other hand complied with Company law requiringis there was no compliance whatsoever with
them to prepare accounts for each financial yearEnron's operations. Enforcement does not
which give a true and fair view of the state ofnecessarily mean there would be compliance.
affairs of the company and the Group and of theEnforcement precedes compliance and could be
profit or loss of the Group for that period. Wholinked together to the success of corporate
controls the monitor? A lot might have been saidgovernance. Enforcement means to compel
and written about this but it is worth commentingpeople to comply with or do something by law or
that auditors who are meant to control theregulation. Unfortunately this had not been the
system (and for that matter the controllers) arecase in most of the corporate scandal cases. No
human beings. They have conscience and thusone seemed to enforce the laws and regulations;
someone or somebody could be said to alsonot the independent directors or the regulators
monitor them and the cycle goes on and on.themselves. The significance of this is that
What is actually needed in my opinion is littlecompliance to laws and regulations does not come
honesty, morals and fear of God.easily without independent directors disciplining
The four-member Next's audit committeethemselves to follow the regular review of risk
reviews the risk management process andmanagement issues for the company concerned.
significant risk issues are referred to the BoardNevertheless, corporate governance could be the
for consideration; and considers financial reportinghub to the reputation of company and its
and reviews the Group's accounting policiesdirectors regardless of other equally important
relating thereto.issues like corporate social responsibility (CSR) for
It must be said here that in particular, majorthe reason that it has widely been embraced for
accounting issues of a subjective nature areits apparent economic health of companies and
discussed by the committee thus zeroing in to thesociety in general. Like Total Quality Management,
issues relevant to Next not just the IASB'scorporate governance should be made
requirement. This procedure might have helpedcompany-wide, stakeholder-focused and rated
the position of Next in the long run and couldgiven awards like the ISOs.The ratings should be
definitely help other companies if they followpublished regularly. This could benefit all stake
those principles.holders and bring back the trust shareholders in
Furthermore, the first basic rule of investing whichparticular have lost in both executive and
was diversification was also breached at Enron.non-executive independent directors.
Workers investing pension money in companyReference:
shares had their savings tied up in Enron's stock;1.'In search of Gates'; Fortune, October 4, 2004
and there was no plan for workers to diversifypp76
those savings and government regulators did2. Elkind, P; Bethany, M; 'They're getting close',
virtually nothing. This is irresponsibility on the partFortune November 24, 2003 page21
of the directors. Workers' anger was evident3. Fortune Europe Edition No.24, December
when in France, for example some company22,2003pp 40
bosses were held hostage. The G204. Gunther, M; 'Boards Beware!' Fortune
demonstrations in London were also other casesNovember 10, 2003 page 80
in point.5.'Inside The Head of BP' by Nelson D.Schwartz,
In Next people are considered a key asset to theFortune, July 2004, page 56
business. The Board has, therefore, adopted6.'LEADERS: The real Scandal' the Economist
policies aimed at minimising risks in the Group'sJanuary 19th, 2002 page9
activities to ensure that they do not harm7. Next Annual Report and accounts, January,
employees, customers or the general public, all of2002
whose interests are regarded as critical to8. Sellers, P. "INNOVATION SPECIAL; P&G:
business success. Shareholders have anTeaching an old dog New Tricks", Fortune; May
opportunity to ask questions or represent their31, 2004 page36, 37, 60-63
views at the Annual General Meeting. This is9. Taylor III, A.