Edmund Burke & His Views on Representative Government

The notion of the value of popular opinion indefines the national interest as the majority
government has long remained one of the mostopinion of the nation, then the two concepts of
hotly debated issues of public representation sincenational interest and public opinion become virtually
the inception of representative government.the same in nature. If one holds the opinion that
Though the representatives in a governmentalnational interest is defined by the people, then
body are undoubtedly there to serve the peopleBurke's argument promptly falls to pieces. One
they govern, the question remains whether theycannot separate national interest from personal
serve their people better by voting in the pursuitopinions if they are defined by one another and
of the common good or rather they vote towardthus, ignoring, or rather selectively absorbing public
the opinions of their immediate constituents.opinion actually deprives legislatures of the
Edmund Burke argues in favor of apertinent information they need regarding the
representative government that serves its peopleneeds of their country. Through this analysis, one
through the pursuit of the common good rathercan see that Burke's argument is rather idealistic
their constituent opinions, and furthermore, arguesin nature, and requires the representatives to rely
that the latter philosophy on representativeon a higher power in order to glean an effective
government is not only harmful to thestrategy for government. Where does this
effectiveness of a the government as a whole,wisdom truly come from? If there is no higher
but is destructive to the entire governmentalpower to guide the representatives, are they not
system. In his Speech to the Electors of Bristol,simply avoiding the obvious truth that they are
Burke claims that the representatives in athere to serve the people, and as a result must
government maintain the distinct responsibility tolisten to them? As Burke bases his argument on
serve the government and the country, and notthis idealistic notion of a higher power, his
be swayed by the whims of the people thatargument falls apart at the definition of national
elected them but rather serve them throughinterest.
service to the country as a whole. This ideaWhen one applies Edmund Burke's political and
stands in direct contrast to the concept ofgovernmental theory to the modern United
populism, and downright debunks this ideology toStates government, one is undoubtedly going to
an extent. Burke is correct in his claim that afind a significant different between the two
representative does hold the responsibility topolitical philosophies. Though Burke argued that
serve his or her country rather than just a smallrepresentative government that pandered to its
group of interests, however, in a practical sense,constituents is destructive and ineffective, the
this form of representative government oftenUnited States government does exactly this.
alienates the people's interests entirely. TheRepresentatives of the United States government
national interest is a very vague conceptoften are forced to pander to their constituents in
however, and is more readily defined by theorder to get reelected. Through the institution of
majority opinion, rather than through contraryterm limits, the United States has allowed
foresight. Burke's argument practically falls apart ifrepresentatives to be checked by their
one defines the national interest as a conceptconstituents. This virtually limits the freedom of
determined by the people as a whole. The currentdecision that a legislature would have if it did not
system of government in the United States hashave to worry about its job depending on the
undoubtedly deviated from Burke's originalopinion of the people it represented. Unfortunately,
opinions, centering much more on the opinions ofin the United States, the people define the
the people rather than the judgment of thegovernment as good when it serves them
elected officials themselves. This has surely limiteddirectly. This requires the government to serve
the freedom of the representatives and foreverthe interests of a variety of political philosophies
chained them to their electorate. Through anand social ideologies. In doing so, the government
analysis of Burke's ideologies, it becomes incrediblynot only grossly overextends itself, but it often
clear the intention of representative democracydivides over politically sensitive issues such as
as a whole and the original intent of the Unitedtaxes. The people of the United States do not
States governmental system.care whether the government is serving the
Edmund Burke argues that the representativesnational interest, in the short term or the long
elected to a government have the responsibilityterm. The government has become an entirely
to vote according to their own judgments in theresults driven institution. If the people do not
pursuit of the common good, rather than theapprove of the decisions of a representative, he
judgments of the people that elected them. Thisor she will lose their job. Through this system, the
is surely the ideal manner in which thegovernment has become incredibly ineffective, as
government should conduct itself. It stands toBurke predicted that it would. The system in
sound reason that the government should beaction prevents representatives from serving the
impartial in all decisions regarding things that wouldcountry first, and rather forces them to pander
be good for the country as a whole, or theto the minor whims and desires of those who
national interest. However, having said this, it iselected them. In doing so, this has greatly reduced
also undeniable that this form of government canthe capacity for action in the Federal government,
easily lead to the alienation of the people aswith the debate over petty social issues such as
whole, rather than the alienation of public opinion.abortion ruling the legislative capabilities of
It is true that public opinion is incredible volatile inCongress. With a two party system, the
determining policies that would benefit thegovernment is divided between two entirely
country, the absence of the people from thedifferent sets of interests and goals intended to
government could lead to an incredible disaster.please the very people that put them in office.
The government must be familiar with the desiresThis system has done exactly what Burke
of the people in order to maintain an accuratepredicted that it would, and in doing so, vindicates
definition of what the national interest is. NumbersBurke to some extent in his political philosophy.
and facts often do not tell the entire story on theRegardless of the methods involved,
state of the nation as a whole. When the peoplerepresentative government is intended to serve
are eliminated completely from the decisionthe people, whether through the pursuit of the
making process of government, the governmentnational interest or through the placation of a
itself ceases to become a representative body ofrepresentative's constituents. As long as man has
legislature, and rather becomes a governing bodywalked the earth, he has searched for a way to
completely out of touch and unfamiliar with themodify his surroundings in order to better live.
people it controls. If the government is unfamiliarThis is precisely the purpose of representative
with the people it governs entirely, it cannotgovernment. However, as Edmund Burke
effectively serve those people in any kind of adescribes in his Speech to the Electors of Bristol,
meaningful way, and thus, on this level, Burke'srepresentative government should ideally not be
theories on representative government are ratherplaced entirely subject to the fickle and often
impractical. While it would be incredibly ideal toselfish whims of the general population. These
have representatives in government who knowideas greatly influenced the political philosophies of
exactly what their people need and serve that,the founding fathers as they created a new
rather than what they want, this is not howgovernment and a new country, the United
Burke's system of government functions in aStates of America. Unfortunately, though Burke is
large reality such as the United Statescorrect in theory, the practice of his political
government. Such a system often leads to notideology often leads to a total alienation of the
only unhappy people, but an unhappy, unstable,people from the governmental process that
and ineffective country as a whole.control them, resulting in an unhappy populace.
The national interest is an inseparable part ofAdditionally, if one considers the national interest
representative democracy, and remains at theto be defined by the majority of opinion in a
very heart of Burke's philosophy regardingcountry, then Burke's argument promptly falls
governmental responsibility. Though theapart due to the combination of the two
government truly exists to serve the nationaldistinctions he makes, the national interest and the
interest, the question remains whether theopinions of the constituents. When applied to the
national interest exists, or if it is just an idealmodern governmental system of the United
concept intended to illustrate the wayStates, one can barely see remnants of Burke's
government is supposed to work, rather thanpolitical ideology in Congress. Representatives are
how it does work. Burke claims that the nationaloften slaves and workhorses of the people they
interest takes precedence over all kinds of localrepresent, living in constant fear that they may
interests and public opinion. However, it islose their job if they fail to produce what their
debatable whether any representative is trulybase considers progress. This governmental
aware of the national interest in general. Thesystem prevents legislatures from acting freely in
national interest is the policies and laws that thetheir decisions, and somewhat vindicates Burke's
country requires to function effectively and topolitical theories. However, when examined from a
please its people. By this definition however, itrealistic perspective, one must understand that
stands to reason that anyone who has knowledgepeople must play an active role in their
of the national interest possesses incrediblegovernment, not to prevent their representatives
foresight regarding the state of the country.from acting free, but to ensure that those
Edmund Burke distinguishes between the nationalrepresenting them are connected with a relevant
interest and the opinion of the people as twocommon good for all.
separate entities. Interestingly enough, if one