Do Mass Media Influence the Political Behavior of Citizens

Outside of the academic environment, a harshcitizens have adequate knowledge of political
and seemingly ever-growing debate has appeared,events. But how do citizens acquire the
concerning how mass media distorts the politicalinformation and knowledge necessary for them to
agenda. Few would argue with the notion that theuse their votes other than by blind guesswork?
institutions of the mass media are important toThey cannot possibly witness everything that is
contemporary politics. In the transition to liberalhappening on the national scene, still less at the
democratic politics in the Soviet Union and Easternlevel of world events. The vast majority are not
Europe the media was a key battleground. In thestudents of politics. They don't really know what
West, elections increasingly focus aroundis happening, and even if they did they would
television, with the emphasis on spin andneed guidance as to how to interpret what they
marketing. Democratic politics places emphasis onknew. Since the early twentieth century this has
the mass media as a site for democratic demandbeen fulfilled through the mass media. Few today
and the formation of "public opinion". The mediain United States can say that they do not have
are seen to empower citizens, and subjectaccess to at least one form of the mass media,
government to restraint and redress. Yet theyet political knowledge is remarkably low. Although
media are not just neutral observers but arepolitical information is available through the
political actors themselves. The interaction ofproliferation of mass media, different critics
mass communication and political actors --support that events are shaped and packaged,
politicians, interest groups, strategists, and othersframes are constructed by politicians and news
who play important roles -- in the political processcasters, and ownership influences between political
is apparent. Under this framework, the Americanactors and the media provide important short
political arena can be characterized as a dynamichand cues to how to interpret and understand the
environment in which communication, particularlynews.
journalism in all its forms, substantially influencesOne must not forget another interesting fact
and is influenced by it.about the media. Their political influence extends
According to the theory of democracy, peoplefar beyond newspaper reports and articles of a
rule. The pluralism of different political partiesdirect political nature, or television programs
provides the people with "alternatives," and if andconnected with current affairs that bear upon
when one party loses their confidence, they canpolitics. In a much more subtle way, they can
support another. The democratic principle ofinfluence people's thought patterns by other
"government of the people, by the people, andmeans, like "goodwill" stories, pages dealing with
for the people" would be nice if it were all soentertainment and popular culture, movies, TV
simple. But in a medium-to-large modern state"soaps", "educational" programs. All these types of
things are not quite like that. Today, severalinformation form human values, concepts of good
elements contribute to the shaping of the public'sand evil, right and wrong, sense and nonsense,
political discourse, including the goals and successwhat is "fashionable" and "unfashionable," and what
of public relations and advertising strategies usedis "acceptable" and "unacceptable". These human
by politically engaged individuals and the risingvalue systems, in turn, shape people's attitude to
influence of new media technologies such as thepolitical issues, influence how they vote and
Internet.therefore determine who holds political power.
A naive assumption of liberal democracy is that