Delegated Media Regulation Within the Context of Broadcasting in South Africa

IntroductionFourie argues that "The narrow articulation of the
This paper discusses the concept of delegatedpublic interest by the previous government was
media regulation within the context ofalso clearly reflected in telecommunications policy
broadcasting in South Africa. It briefly discussesformulation and the implementation of this policy
the history of media regulation during theunder apartheid." As in broadcasting and print
apartheid period; the transformation ofmedia, freedom to better services and access to
broadcasting media from an authoritarianthis sector featured strongly in its policy
government, to a liberalised media, the impact offormulation; also the application of universal
the transformation with regards to internal mediaservice as a policy instrument reflected the
policies; focusing mostly in broadcasting mediahistorical inequalities of the South African society
policy. The paper will then discuss the formation(Fourie, 2001).
of independent regulatory agencies byThe rise to democracy saw South Africa taking
government as delegated bodies; to monitorcognisance of the international trends; which
broadcasting media. These include theincluded the deregulation of the
Independent Broadcasting Act of 1993 (IBA), thetelecommunications and broadcasting, and the
South African Telecommunications Regulatoryphasing out of monopolies. Also technological
Authority (SATRA) and the merger to thedevelopments which include convergence between
Independent Communications Authority of Southbroadcasting and telecommunications impacted on
Africa (ICASA), the Broadcasting Complaintsthe regulation of both sectors.
Commission of South Africa (BCCSA), and theThe emergence of the first democratic elections
existence of the Media Diversity andin South Africa also lead to the transformation of
Development Agency (MDDA). In discussing thesethe SABC as a public broadcaster; thus the
bodies, the paper will look at the role played byformation of the Independent Broadcasting Act
these organisations in regulating broadcasting(IBA)1993, and the South African
media, and the impact they have in theTelecommunications Regulatory Authority of 1996.
development and monitoring of broadcastingSATRA was established as an independent body
media.to regulate the telecommunications industry. Also
Brief Historyas the independent regulator SATRA had to
Apartheid affected every single aspect of Southbalance the interests of consumers, and the
Africa, including the media. Laws that regulatedstakeholders in Telkom as well as the market
the media were tailor-made to restrict freedomparticipants. The formation of these two bodies
of expression and subject the media to thewas due to the need to ensure the development
extremes of the apartheid government. Beforeof the media in areas of public broadcasting,
the rise of democracy, South Africa showedcommercial and community broadcasting, and
essential features of aristocracy; which consistedlastly to guard against internal media policy.
of whites, Indians and coloured people nominatedAs part of the transformation the IBA called for
to the legislative assembly. The ideology ofthe Triple Inquiry, which stated that the
apartheid brought division among the Southindependence of the media is a central public
African society along racial lines. The divisions inprinciple which ensures editorial freedom (Triple
society and domination of the majority by theInquiry Report, 1995). In 1995 the government
minority were reflected in policy formulation;indicated that it "fully recognised and accepted the
which included stipulations that restricted therole of the media to be a critical commentator on
media (Fourie, 2004: 168). This was evident as thegovernment activity in the country" and that "the
government exercised its powers in themedia should be beyond the control of
broadcasting media. When the SABC wasgovernment" (Johnson, 1996: 297, sited in Steyn).
established in parliament, it was said to be theThe IBA was subsequently merged with SATRA
public broadcaster; but this was not the case.in 2000 to form the Independent Communications
Because of political philosophies related to theAuthority of South Africa (ICASA). The merger
political values of the society and those in powerwas to ensure effective and seamless regulation
at the time, the SABC was the state broadcasterof the telecommunications and the broadcasting
and not a public broadcaster; and as a result wassectors as well as to accommodate the
said to be the apartheid state's most powerfulconvergence of technologies. Through the
propaganda tool Dennis Jjuuko (2005: 3).formation of this independent regulatory body, it
According to Jjuuko "The assumption to politicalwas then decided that editorial independence
power by the National Party in 1948 meant thetogether with internal media policies were of
Afrikanerisation of the SABC, which was achievedoutmost importance; that the broadcaster (using
largely through controls of the board." Jjuukothe SABC as an example) should safeguard its
continues to say that during this time the SABCeditorial independence to ensure its credibility as a
had to play a "significant role in the politics of thenational source of reliable and regular information.
day, with no space to make independent editorialAs the democracy years rolled over, successive
decisions." This particularly had a negative impactministers of communication attempted to claw
on the importance on the SABC's internal policies.back some of the forfeited control over
As a result the SABC was referred to as "hiselectronic communications, and correspondingly
master's voice", as it gave the government areduce some of the independence for the players
platform to articulate the apartheid ideology, toinvolved. This trend has also been in broadcasting.
control the people of South Africa; particularly"Government has felt that SABC has been law
blacks.unto itself in deciding how to deliver on, and be
In support of this argument, one of the main lawsaccountable for, its legally enshrined mandate"
that restricted media freedom was the one that(Berger, 2005). This is what led to the introduction
reduced the broadcast/publication of activities ofof editorial policies in the SABC, which was initiated
anti-government black groups. Fourie (2004)by the Broadcasting Amendment Bill of 2002. In
argues that from the apartheid laws "one canembracing the importance of these internal media
deduce that the public interest was very narrowlypolicies; parliament declared the independent
defined. (That) Many laws/policies of the apartheidregulator ICASA; which works at arms length
regime only made provision for the interest offrom the government to approve them.
the minority and the security for their dominantICASA derives its mandate from ICASA Act of
position."2000, the Independent Broadcasting Act of 1993,
Even though freedom of speech was in theBroadcasting act of 1999, and
constitution, it was not enshrined in the Bill ofTelecommunications Authority Act of 1996.
Rights, thus media freedom was not guaranteed.ICASA's mandate includes the regulation of
According to Fourie government/external policiesbroadcasting in the public interest, and to perform
forced the media to operate in a very restrictiveadjudication functions. As part of delegated media
legal framework; with more than 100 laws thatregulation, ICASA works hand-in-hand with the
restricted the conduct of journalists as well asBroadcasting Complaints Commission of South
media content. Government had the right to banAfrica. The BCCSA was set up by National
publications and to insist on the approval of mediaAssociation of broadcaster of Southern Africa in
content before publication. This made the1993 to adjudicate and mediate complaints against
reporting of misconduct of government officialsbroadcasters/broadcasting licence holders.
very difficult; and criticising the state was out ofICASA also ensures fairness and diversity of
the question.views broadly representing South African society.
2. Transformation of broadcasting mediaOne of its objectives is to ensure that in the
The transition to democracy during the mid 1990sprovision of broadcasting services, the needs to
raised questions on how to transform the medialanguage, cultural and religious groups, and the
as an organ of "racist ideology into a forum ofneed of educational programmes, are taken into
the advancement of national unity and equality"consideration (ICASA Position Paper 2000). It also
(Ashley Dawson). The transformation of thepromotes and encourages ownership and control
media incorporated issues of deregulation,of telecommunications and broadcasting services
liberalisation, diversification, industrialisation,from historically disadvantaged groups. Again
convergence and privatisation. Also to be takenICASA works with the Media Diversity and
into account were economic issues, social and/Development. Agency which also ensures the
cultural issues, which include nationalism, localempowerment of previously disadvantaged
languages and cultural diversity; politicalgroups.
issues-focusing on freedom of expression and3.2 The Media Diversity and Development Agency
freedom of speech, as well as the control andAfter the 1994 democratic elections, the media in
regulation of the media.South Africa was still not reflective of the
Early 1990, the National Party saw itself beingcountry's diversity. The legacy of apartheid still
influenced to take a liberal policy route in itsplayed itself in various spheres of society, including
broadcasting policies. This was due to thethe media, where the nature of the public
formation of a Task Group which was led bydiscourse was shaped by patterns of ownership
Professor H.C Viljoen, on Broadcasting in Southand control, such that the poor and disadvantage
Africa. The findings of the Task Group were notremained marginalised. The White Paper on
at all in favour of the apartheid governmentBroadcasting Policy, 1998 concluded that, "Society
broadcasting policies. The recommendations werebenefits from free, independent, and pluralistic
of a programming that "would cater for allmedia." It was then decided that a supportive
sections of the general public" (Jjuuko, 2005). In apolicy environment was required; and in achieving
place of serving government, the SABC was tothis Government committed itself to corrective
serve the public. The findings were clearlyaction.
influenced by a functionalist paradigm and notThis was due to the need to rectify the wrongs
power as was the case before.inflicted by apartheid in media development and
Early 1994, the National Party (NP) and thediversity. Government took an initiative to set up
African National Congress (ANC) agreed for thean independent agency that will address problems
"SABC not to be used as a tool for political abuse"of the media development and diversity in the
(Berger, 2004). Pressures rose as mediacountry and provide assistance through loans and
practitioners were threatened by police andsubsidies to the marginalised groups (MDDA
political activists, trying by all means to interfereposition paper, November 2000). The MDDA's
with internal media policies and decisions. Mediamandate is to promote diversity and development
freedom was then enshrined in the constitution,in print, broadcasting and new media. It works
as the right to information and freedom ofwith bodies dealing with Telecommunications,
speech.licensing and film. Also develops policies that are
Internal media policyinformed by ongoing research and evaluation.
Internal policy can not be excluded from the4. Conclusion
external policy framework, for it is alwaysIt is of common knowledge that freedom of
formulated within the parameters of the externalexpression is one of the hallmarks of democracy;
framework. This is due to the link between thewhich requires a media that is free from state
media, economic and political structure of acontrol. Before the democratisation of South
country. Fourie (2001:190) states that "InternalAfrica, the South African government was
media policy formulation takes place within theempowered to control the media, to limit free
structure and operation of a medium itself. (Andspeech as it pleased. During this time newspapers
that) Gatekeepers are generally responsible forwere closed down, and anything that seemed to
policy formulation on this level."be giving voice to the voiceless, being a novel or
A new political dispensation in South Africaa film, it was banned. Press freedom was at this
impacted on the internal policy formulation oftime described as having "its left leg in plaster, its
South Africa's public broadcaster. There were alsoright arm in a sling a patch over the left eye,
changes in the legal framework in the country, asdeafness in the right ear, a sprained ankle and a
the media could not broadcast nor publish certainnumber of teeth knocked out" (Joel Merwis, 1979,
information. "The unbanning of politicalin Berger 2004).
organisations and political leaders in 1990 had anIn redressing the historic imbalances caused by
immediate impact on media internal policy" (Fourie).the apartheid policies, government saw it
This was due to the fact that the apartheid newsnecessary to free the airwaves by delegating
policy specified that the SABC would not offer amedia regulation to independent bodies. This was
platform to opposition parties (Fourie, 2001). Afterand still is a way of ensuring democracy in the
1990, the media experienced a more liberalmedia sector. The telecommunications Green
working environment as the laws that restrictedpaper stipulates that, "telecoms is an important
the media were amended; living more room formeans of building democracy by giving citizens
internal media policy.access to the information and telecommunications
As media democracy was in transition,services that enable them to participate
government saw a need to delegate control toeffectively in the decision-making process of
independent regulatory bodies to deal with mediasociety," thus the formation of SATRA to guard
policy. These independent bodies would performagainst government interference.
duties of allocation of frequency spectrum andICASA and the MDDA also work hand-in-hand to
licensing, the monitoring of broadcasters'ensure that "the central public interest principle in
compliance with licence conditions, including contentbroadcasting is that of universal access, that
issues and competition, as well as protecting andthere is a diverse range of language, religious, and
upholding the editorial and programmingcultural programming," (MDDA, 2005). One can
independence of all broadcasters. All theseconclude and say the independent regulators are
changes were inevitably going to have an impactworking towards harmonising dysfunctions; which
on both the power and importance of internalcan include opportunities for small media
media policies over government external policies incompanies, challenges or problems around media
both print and broadcasting media.policies to improve the functioning of broadcasting
3. Independent regulatory bodiesmedia as a whole.
3.1 SATRA - IBA - ICASA