Corporate Governance - Where Did it Go?

"An internal system encompassing policies,corporation's governance policy. The person's lack
processes and people, which serves the needs ofof integrity allowed them to make an immoral
shareholders and other stakeholders, by directingdecision to create wealth for him or herself.
and controlling management activities with goodSenior management is often to blame as well. A
business savvy, objectivity, accountability andlot can lead a top manager within a company to
integrity," is the way Gabrielle O'Donovan definesbreaking from the corporate governance policy.
corporate governance in, "A Board Culture ofCareer concerns or pride can foster decisions that
Corporate Governance." "Corporate governance isa person, under normal conditions, wouldn't make.
most often viewed as both the structure and theFor instance, if a manager is given a quota he or
relationships which determine corporate directionshe has to reach in a certain time period, the
and performance," according to corpgov.net. Aspressure they feel to succeed may allow them to
you can see, delineating the phenomenon ofmake an unethical decision. If they are under the
corporate governance can be an obstacle in it ofbelief that not reaching that quota is going to cost
itself; now just imagine trying to instill a corporatethem their job, anything in the realm of
governance policy within a company.possibilities to keep their job may be done.
It is possible that the lack of a one unambiguousAnother reason top management may look the
characterization of corporate governance is theother way when they know something that the
foundation from which fraud has grown fromCEO is doing is wrong is because they feel a deep
over the past few decades; however, it is trulyloyalty to them. In the late 1960s,
unlikely. Going back to the end of O'Donovan'supper-management at Quasar Stellar Company
definition of corporate governance, the realknowingly allowed falsified records to be sent to
growth place of fraud is a lack of objectivity,the parent company, Universal Nucleonics
accountability and integrity within corporations.Company, as directed by the CEO. When
Corporate governance follows a hierarchicalinterviewed, Peter Loomis VP of Marketing said "I
outline, with the Board of Directors at the top,always felt that I owe more loyalty to my
then senior management, followed by internalsupervisor that to the company" (Fendrock, "A
auditors and finally external entities (Lawrence,Crisis in Conscience at Quasar").
Weber, Business and Society 12th Ed.). AnThe issue with internal auditors is pretty simple to
organization's corporate governance policy canunderstand. The people you constantly work with
only be as strong as its weakest practitioner, andnaturally become your friends. An internal auditor
the weakest practitioner can reside in any level ofreports to the Board of Directors, people whom
the hierarchy. How and/or why does athey rarely see, about the work of the senior
corporation's governance policy fail?management, the people that they work with day
First look at the top, the Board of Directors level.in and day out. Thus, a conflict of interest arises -
The board is responsible with creating thedoes the internal auditor want to report to the
company's corporate governance policy, thereforeboard that management has falsified the reports
they have no excuse as to why they wouldn'tand risk losing their friend, or do they want to let
know or follow the policies. This doesn't imply thatmanagement get away with what they are doing
fraud doesn't exist at the top level in anyway.and inform the board that all is well to keep their
Members of the Board of Directors of afriends? It's a tight line to walk, and sometimes
company take-part in fraudulent activities forcorporate governance takes a backseat to
numerous reasons. First off, members of thefriendship.
board are voted on, and no qualifications exist.External entities, public accountants for example,
Anyone can be voted into a position of greatalso have an interest in fraudulent activities within
power within an organization; so in reality,a company. When public accountants audited a
someone unfamiliar with business practices couldcompany in the past, they often did it for multiple
easily take part in fraudulent activities and notyears straight and a relationship formed between
even be aware of it. Another reason deceit isthe company and public accountant. The
found with the Board of Directors is due torelationship could grow, and in addition to auditing
conflicts of interest. Board members, sincethe company, the accountant would provide
anyone can be voted in, are sometimes on otherconsulting services. The consulting services
company's Board of Directors, or are sometimesprovided were much more lucrative than the
the company's senior management (Lawrence,auditing services, so naturally one would one to
Weber, Business and Society 12th Ed.). Ankeep the company as a client for consulting. A
example of a conflict of interest for a personconflict of interest presents itself because of this
who is part of senior management and on thepoint; if the public accountant finds that the
board could be making a business decision thatcompany is falsifying records, the company can
raises the company's stock price, as the CEO thisthreaten to revoke its desire for the consulting
person is awarded stock options as part of theirservices from the accountant if the accountant
pay, while that decision did not fit in with thereports them.