Constitutional Rubbish

Americans need a civics lesson. And so doin a speech: "No law can give Congress a
politicians. Of all the wrong and delusional thinkingbackbone if it refuses to stand up as the co-equal
about the US Constitution the one that is mostbranch the Constitution made it." Do presidents
thoroughly incorrect and routinely used for politicalreally want coequal branches? I think not. But
propaganda purposes is that there are threethey want Americans to keep believing in
coequal branches of the federal government.coequality, because it sounds good and adds an
You hear presidents, members of Congress andaura of respect for government that politicians
media pundits say it all the time. They are wrong.desperately want.
Nowhere in the Constitution or the FederalistIn reality, presidents with the most political power
Papers is there any statement or declaration thatwant others with far less power to feel good.
the three branches are coequal. Why has thisThey want to keep the public believing
myth persisted for so long? Why do so many(incorrectly) that the president is very limited in
prominent and supposedly educated people keeppower. If George W. Bush proved anything it was
invoking this outright lie?not just that he created the imperial presidency,
Make no mistake. Either in theory or practice isbut that over time the presidency has become a
there any basis whatsoever for believing that themostly unchecked, pre-eminent and over-powerful
legislative, executive and judicial branches of thegovernment force. They have accumulated far
federal government are coequal. It also defiesmore powers than ever envisioned by the
common sense.Constitution. By regularly invoking the false
Historical analysis has always shown that thecoequality of branches argument and its
Founders, if anything, intended for Congress to bederivative checks and balances thesis, presidents
preeminent, and not the President and theintentionally spread the propaganda to safeguard
executive branch. For example, only Congress hasan all-powerful presidency and executive branch.
the constitutional power to remove the PresidentMeanwhile, Americans are largely ignorant that
and other high officers of the executive branchCongress has refused to honor and obey an
as well as the judiciary, but the latter cannotimportant constitutional option in Article V: a
remove any member of Congress. And Congressconvention of state delegates that could propose
has control of raising and spending governmentconstitutional amendments, despite over 750
funds as well as the power to overrule anyapplications from all 50 states for a convention. It
presidential attempt to veto legislation. Thatis their way of preserving exclusivity for
Congress does not always choose to fullyproposing amendments and presidents say nothing
exercise its constitutional powers does notbecause they fear amendments curbing their
remove them.power. The Supreme Court does nothing because
As to the Supreme Court and the whole judiciary,it likes amending the Constitution through its
they function only as long as Congress providesdecisions.
funds, the executive branch provides security,Understand this: Having distinct constitutional
and both choose to obey court decisions. Moreresponsibilities does not make branches coequal.
importantly, the Supreme Court does not act onThe myth of coequality protects our delusional
its own to enforce the Constitution, even whendemocracy and makes a mockery of our
the President and Congress disobey it, but it could.constitutional republic. If people really want coequal
It is time for Americans to stop and think. Inbranches then they should start thinking about a
what exact ways are the three branchesconstitutional amendment to make it so.
coequal? According to the dictionary coequalAlternatively, we need Congress and the judiciary
means resembling each other in all respects. Butto act with far greater strength and conviction to
ridding the culture of constitutional myths seemsuse their constitutional powers and more
awfully difficult, especially since Garry Willseffectively constrain presidential powers.
published his excellent book "A Necessary Evil" aIf prominent people tell a lie enough times, again,
decade ago, which artfully exposed a number ofand again, and again, then the public lie becomes
them.accepted fact, a cultural myth. So it is with the
In particular, presidents seem to like talking aboutthree coequal branches of government lie. It will
the coequal branches of government, includingbe defended. It serves a purpose: False
Barack Obama. In January 2008 Obama said thisconfidence in constitutional government.