Comparative Employee Relations

QUESTION ONE:said state or country.
COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE POLITICALQUESTION TWO:
ORIENTATION OF TRADE UNIONS FROM ANYTO WHAT EXTENT AND WHY DOES THE ROLE
TWO COUNTRIES. EVALUATE THEOF THE STATE IN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT OF THIS ON THEIRDIFFER. (ADDRESS THIS QUESTION BY USING
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SYSTEMS.EXAMPLES DRAWN FROM AT LEAST TWO
INTRODUCTION:COUNTRIES).
A trade union is similar in character to a laborINTRODUCTION:
union. Generally, a trade union can be defined asIndustrial relations concern itself with the
an organization or grouping of persons who arerelationship that exists in any economy between
closely associated due to their mode ofworkers or organized groups of workers and the
employment or the nature of labor they providemanagement. The workers are mostly
to an economy. These organizations exist forrepresented by trade unions.
both casual and formal employees, as well as theGovernments or states have always been
unemployed. Trade unions may be founded byinvolved in industrial relations for a long time now.
individual workers, past workers or professionalsThe reasons for their involvements always differ
in a certain field of work.from state to state. Even within the same state
The major but not the only objective of tradethe role and extent of government, involvement
unions is the improvement or maintenance of thein the industrial relations will always depend on the
working or employment conditions of workers.regime in power. In addition to this, the ideological
HISTORY:dimension of the regime always influences its
Trade unions have been evolving for the last 100involvement in industrial relations.
years. Many trade unions arose during the periodCommand economies like North Korea and Cuba
of the rise of the industrial revolution in Westernhave extensive government control not only in
Europe.industrial relations but also generally in all
During this period, much of Western Europe wasoccupations. On the other hand, liberal democrats
revolutionizing from an agrarian mode ofhave always allowed a system of laissez faire to
production to an industrial mode of production.supersede and they only involve themselves in
The rise of trade unionism was because of theindustrial relations mostly in the field of formulation
introduction of new work techniques as well as anand implementation of government policies.
increasing downward pressure the then existingThe extent and the nature of this involvement will
structures of traditional wagealways depend on the state itself as well as the
On top of this, the expanding industrial societyideological background of the ruling party.
was drawing more children, women, immigrantsIn this analysis, I will look at the role of the state
as well as rural workers in to the urban culture.in two industrial states (Britain and France). In
This pool of semi skilled labor as well as unskilledanalyzing this relationship, we shall assume that
labor started to organize themselves in smallthe main reason for the two states involvement
groups in order to articulate their plight collectively.in industrial relations is purely for regulation
This marked the onset of trade unionism.purposes. Thus, we shall use the Regulationist
POLITICAL ORIENTATION OF TRADE UNIONS:approach in order to analyze the role of state
The political dimensions or political orientations ofinstitutions in the industrial relations.
trade unions have always been determined by theBoth France and Britain are industrial powers.
nature and type of political regimes existent inSince the 1980s, thaw role of the state in
their economies all over the world. Due to thisindustrial relations has always had some similarities
reason, many trade unions especially in formeras well as some disparities. Britain under
colonial states ended up forming themselves intoThatcherism and France under Gaullism had their
political parties. In other democracies these tradestrengths and weaknesses when it came to the
unions concentrated only in their field ofrole of state intervention in the systems of
specialization and only rarely did they formindustrial relations and regulation.
themselves into political parties.Government involvement in the industrial
For the purposes of this paper, I will look at theprocesses usually conceals some form of class
political orientation of trade unions in onepower. Thus, the only influencing factor that
developed western country and one developingenables the state to maintain this form of control
African country (Britain and Kenya).is usually an invisible yet present form of balance
The rise of trade unionism in Britain could be bestof class power within the economy as well as an
analyzed on a modernization theory perspective.existing agreement between the economic
On the other hand, in order to understand the riseinterests of employers, workers and the state.
of trade unionism in Kenya, which happens to beScholars have argued that states intervene or
a former British colony can only be bestinvolve themselves in the restructuring of the
understood from a dependency theoryindustrial relations because they have their own.
perspective.Some of these reasons may be political, social,
Trade unions both in Britain and in Kenya have aeconomic or even strategic in a security-wise
long history of getting overly involved in politicalmanner.
affairs. Surprisingly in both countries, there areBoth the governments of Britain and France have
instances where certain trade unions have turnedbeen involved in the processes of industrial
into political parties and contested for nationalrelations especially when the nature of the
elections. Trade unions in Kenya have always hadcompetition in a particular industry is deemed to
a political dimension ever since the struggle forbe unfair or discriminatory e.g. in the case of
independence from Britain began. Many tradeTesco and Carrefour in the case of Britain and
unions were on the front line in advocating for theFrance respectively. In addition, the two states
release of detained freedom fighters and everhave always been involved in settling industrial
since, they have always been very political.disputes either directly through workers unions or
Trade unions in both countries have been highlyindirectly through tribunals. In addition, they have
involved in political campaigns, especially for politicalalways been monitoring the sensitivity of demand
parties that they consider to be of importance toto economic conditions.
them. The British labor union was one of theBy monitoring this sensitivity, they have always
driving forces of bringing the labor party tobeen able to implement the necessary micro and
power. Likewise, the Kenya federation of labormacro economic policies through either the fiscal
was supportive of bringing the current NARCpolicies or the monetary and foreign exchange
regime in to power in Kenya. Additionally thesepolicies in order to ensure that there is maximum
trade unions have always been keen on criticizingproductivity within their industrial sectors.
bad legislation or poor government policies in allThe industrial relations systems of the two
sectors of the economy.countries are relatively similar since both states
In almost all countries of the world there is noare capitalistic in nature. These industrial relations
country where trade unions have failed to conflictrepresent a collective system of regulatory
with the ruling regimes. This is in no exception tomechanisms that have widely been used in
trade unions in Britain and Kenya. Kenya havingsettling industrial disputes and problems like strikes,
been a former colony of Britain and given thehigh inflation, high unemployment as well as
fact that it is still a member of theever-recurring political crisis.
commonwealth countries it shares a lot inDue to the fact that states can and do, exercise
common with not only Britain but with almost allthe monopoly of power states thus have the
of the commonwealth countries. On the field ofnecessary capabilities and capacities to influence
trade unionism, the extent of political radicalismpolicies that will ultimately be accepted by the
evident within the British trade unions is still rifeindustrial organizations.
and rampant within Kenyan trade unions as well.DIFFERENCES:
Additionally trade unions in both Kenya and BritainDespite these similarities in the role of the state in
have always been politically associated with theindustrial relations, there are still some remarkable
ruling elite, or a certain class of the bourgeoisie.differences between the state roles in those
This involvement between certain high-rankingsame relations between the two states. These
politicians or leaders has always made tradedifferences were not only structural but they
unions to be highly political. This is because thesewere also because of the legacies of specific
trade unions are used as instruments forindustrial relations that the two economies
campaigns between the different politicians and oradopted from their past. These legacies
political parties.compounded by internal structural difficulties and
DIFFERENCES:lack of certain institutional capacity building resulted
Although many trade unions in Kenya arein certain rigidities of dealing with the industrial
relatively young as compared to their Britishrelations in the two states.
counterparts, they still do have the aboveIn the British case, the rigidities were highly
similarities in their operations. However, there areassociated with the deep trade union resources
some very significant differences between tradeand capacities that have been widely spread
unions in the two countries. Some of thesewithin the British economy as well as the system
differences include the following.of decentralization in the collective bargaining in the
Many trade unions in Britain were formed or arework place.
formed within a well laid down legal andThe labor government elected in 1997 did not
administrative system and in addition to this theychange the industrial relations that were existent
usually have a clear cut ideological perspectiveduring the Thatcherism years since 1979.
that is well known and articulated. On top of this,On the side of France, the rigidities especially
they usually have a guiding manifesto that steersduring the ford years were more associated with
the way for their operations. On the other hand,the role of the state mostly on the issue of its
trade unions in Kenya usually do not haveexcessive regulation of the labor market.
manifestos and even if they have, they are rarelyThe other difference between the British and the
followed. On top of this, these trade unions usuallyFrench roles in industrial relations is more political
do not have an ideology to guide their operations.than social. The two countries pursue different
In addition, the legal framework is so complicatedideologies and this resulted in immense structural
that the trade unions themselves are not fullydifferences between the two states.
aware of the powers they have under KenyanCONCLUSION:
law.For the past decade, the industrial relations in both
Secondly, there is the issue of financial security.Britain and France have been improving. The role
Trade unions in Britain usually have enough fundsof the state in industrial relations and reforms has
to finance their operations, this makes it hard forbeen on the decrease. This trend has helped to
the British government to threaten or to takebring some sense of security and facilitation not
action against them. This minimizes the chanceonly some sense of security and facilitation not
that the government could lower their bargainingonly in the industrial relations sector but also the
power, on the other side Kenyan trade unionsrespective economies, as well as the promotion
have very weak financial bases, this makes itof international trade and commerce.
easy for the Kenyan government to ignore themBritain and France are two of the biggest and
and assume their role as irrelevant. This has mademost powerful countries within the European
the trade union movement in Kenya very weakUnion. This means that issues of involvement in
as compared to the British trade unionthe industrial sector is closely monitored since the
movement.effects of their actions will not only be felt within
CONCLUSION:their economies only but also within the wider
Trade unionism is a very important aspect in theEuropean Union as well as their major trading
development of democracies. This is becausepartners as well.
trade unions are always at the forefront togetherREFERENCES:
with other interest groups to keep governmentsAlice H, Amsden. 1971. International Firms and
on their toes. Trade unions ensure thatLabor in Kenya. London: Rout ledge
governments deliver what they claimed theyAnthony, Clayton & Donald, Savage 1975.
would deliver once elected to power. IncaseGovernment and Labor in Kenya, 1895-1963.
governments fail to deliver on their promisesLondon: Rout ledge
trade unions are usually there to demand theFiona Colgan, & Sue, Ledwith. 2002. Gender,
rights of the citizens.Diversity and Trade Unions: International
This involvement in politics ensures thatPerspectives. London: Rout ledge
governments are always working maximally toFrançois Crouzet. 1995. Management and
deliver the greatest happiness to their people.Business in Britain and France: The Age of the
In instances where trade unions are unable to doCorporate Economy. Oxford: Oxford University
their work efficiently and effectively due toPress.
government intimidation like is the case in KenyaHoffmann, J. Waddington, J. Kahmann, M. 2005. A
then this is usually an indicator of someComparison of the Trade Union Merger Process in
deficiencies in the democratic process within theBritain and Germany: Joining Forces?.