Coaching For Accountability

Let's talk about coaching and accountability:someone in a VP position and eventually fired a
Regardless of your industry, employees at all$4 million dollar producer for her company.
levels must be held accountable for the job theyMany managers have not been trained in the skills
are being paid to do. Holding them accountable is arequired to do this part of their job (surprisingly
fine line to walk because most managers don'tcommon) or they just may not think they should
want to harm the relationship and yet thehave to manage the work of another adult on
performance failure must be addressed. Thisthe job. The result: inadequate performance
creates a double bind where managers feel theydoesn't get addressed. What we permit persists.
must choose between two inadequate positions:Small problems can grow in this scenario until the
preserving the relationship at the expense of themanager no longer cares about the relationship
lost performance or achieving the performance atand then makes a first visit to HR expecting the
the expense of a damaged relationship. Often,employee to be terminated. No conversation, no
managers either avoid these difficult interactionsfeedback, no progressive discipline - just out.
(flight) or meet them with an armored positionIn both examples, there is little understanding of
(fight), using blame and anger to get the issuethe function of accountability in shaping desired
resolved while sidestepping the stress andworkplace behavior. Fair and impartial
vulnerability inherent in these conversations. Let'sconsequences must be delivered when necessary
play out these two scenarios and find somebut these interactions should not progress into
alternatives.shouting matches that carry no consequences and
The employee is asked to come into a manager'shurt future loyalty, performance, and retention.
office and explain what caused a performanceGenuine accountability effectively shapes
failure. During this discussion, the manager mayemployee behaviors while maintaining positive
hear a series of explanations and/or excuses thatrelationships until performance requirements are
impacted or negated the employee's ability tosuccessfully met - the only resolution to the
perform as required. On the other hand, themanager's double bind. This means that at no time
employee may simply state that he/she didn'tshould the relationship ever be used as the
know, forgot, or focused on something else aspunishment for performance failures. It is this
the priority. Okay, an account of the problem hasrelationship that the Gallup research in First, Break
been rendered, now what? Let's look at a fightAll The Rules, tells us is the single most important
response first.variable in creating a strong and successful
One company president told me this is when heworkplace. We cannot afford to lose it to
brings out the big guns because he is a strongreactivity, hostility, and blame; rather, it is the
believer in accountability. Lots of yelling andbest tool we have to create excellence with our
threats of termination follow but no consequencesemployees.
ever result. I asked him how effective he felt thisElements Of Accountability Discussions:
method was in creating the needed change and1. Just the facts ma'am. Clear your descriptions of
he reported honestly that it wasn't. He shared histhe problem of any judgments, criticism, or
genuine confusion and frustration that peopleassumptions. Simply describe the problem
wouldn't do the right thing, especially after beingbehavior - what the employee did or said -
regularly held "accountable" through these painfulwithout embellishment.
discussions. With recurring performance failures,2. Investigate. Make sure you understand the root
he would repeat these discussions, simplycause of the problem. By demonstrating genuine
increasing the duration and volume of thecuriosity, you will ensure your full understanding of
outburst. He became the punishment for poorthe problem and the employee's goodwill as you
performance because there was no otherbuild a resolution that can solve the problem once
consequence than being with him during theseand for all.
tirades. This of course negatively influenced all3. Play your part. Remember, we owe our
interactions with him. The relationships wereemployees a set-up for success. If they don't
damaged and the problems remained - ahave what they need to succeed, they can't give
worst-case accountability scenario.us the behaviors we want. Ensure that the
This fight response confuses accountability withexpectations are clear, and that the necessary
hostility. People don't like being verbally abused andtraining, resources, and feedback have been
will typically find a friend to share the experienceprovided. If we don't provide these elements, we
with to receive reassurance that the real problemcan't ethically hold people accountable for their lack
wasn't their performance failure but theof performance.
inappropriate behavior of the boss. Like the mom4. Be consistent, fair, and dispassionate when
who yells at and threatens her misbehaving kids indelivering established consequences. Don't underline
the grocery store but does nothing to stop theirthe seriousness of the consequence with
behavior, our boss is teaching his employees thatemotional reactivity that moves the focus of their
there are no consequences for their "misbehavior"attention from their performance failure to your
other than enduring his tirades and so it doesn'tupset. This will make it easier for them to
matter if they "behave" or not. This threatens thediscount their behavior and emphasize your
emotional bank account and leadership credibilitymisbehavior with them. Keep the attention on
and, over time, will deplete them both.their performance.
The more common response is flight. This5. Finally, address the problem early, when it is still
happens at all levels and can take on many guises.small and easier to resolve. Remember, it's easy
For example, another boss asked me to coachto justify avoiding at this stage - naturally;
her VP of Sales. He brought in lots of business butchoosing your battles and the timing of the
was inconsistent in getting complete and accurateinteraction is important considerations. But the
information necessary to fulfill the sale anddanger in waiting is that it will allow the problem to
communicating it to others. After several sessionsbecome more serious, creating the potential for
she asked if I thought he could be saved. I saidgreater harm for the company, the employee,
yes but that he would need feedback on hisand often the manager who did not address it
performance and would need progressive disciplineearly on. Some early accountability in the form of
if he wandered from the action plan supporting hisfeedback can help save all three from more
required changes. She rejected the idea that sheserious consequences.
should have to manage the performance of