Afghanistan - Is Democracy the Solution Or Part of the Problem?

Having achieved the primary objective of theand utilises fear to sustain support. Without a
invasion, the elimination of Al-Qaeda, why is theradical shift in policy winning the war and winning
conflict intensifying? The war against thethe peace will both remain unattainable goals. The
resurgent Taliban - once supported by the US - isUS and its allies need to accept two basic tenets,
based on the assumption that if they are allowedthe Taliban will not be defeated militarily and
to return to power Al-Qaeda will follow in theirdemocracy in Afghanistan, if it can be delivered at
wake and the threat of international terrorism willall, will not be sustainable.
escalate. In the current climate it is difficult toCounter-insurgency campaigns are always
argue against this hypothesis but is the scenarioprotracted and rarely, of themselves, bring about
inevitable?lasting solutions. The war in Afghanistan has the
The Taliban were initially welcomed as rulers ofadded dimension of jihadism, foreign fighters
Afghanistan following the Soviet withdrawal andsupporting the Taliban to rid an Islamic country
years of civil war but their strict Islamist doctrinefrom invaders. A peaceful solution can only be
soon led to a backlash. Having experienced theattained by utilising the existing tribal system, not
ruthlessness of a Taliban government it is highlyby seeking to impose an alien concept. Although
likely that the majority of Afghans would stronglythere are serious questions about the legitimacy
resist their return.of President Karzai's election and concerns about
The idea that Afghanistan could, in future, be yethis weak, corrupt government his declared intent
again a breeding ground for international terrorismto seek a dialogue with Taliban leaders through a
is highly questionable. Why would they return?'loya jirga', a grand assembly of tribal leaders, is
Al-Qaeda has proved that it can operate fromthe right way forward.
almost any country in the world, displacementLessons need to be learned from Iraq - and from
from Afghanistan has simply encouraged them toVietnam. To some extent the invasion of Iraq has
set up training camps elsewhere.been tarnished by the fiasco over weapons of
The coalition's strategy, to defeat the Taliban andmass destruction but military action in Afghanistan
to install a democratic government in Kabul,has, thus far, retained credibility and international
seems over-simplistic ignoring several fundamentalsupport. The US needs to accept that democracy
issues not least cultural differences. Westernis not a universal panacea that can be liberally
democracies have taken decades if not centuriesexported around the globe. What works in Kansas
to evolve yet the expectation is this can bedoesn't necessarily work in Kabul. It needs to
achieved in Afghanistan virtually overnight. Whycurtail its arrogance and exercise some humility.
would a fragile democracy bring peace andInstead of continually telling occupied countries
stability to a mountainous, tribal country that haswhat they should be doing it's time to start asking
been at the crossroads of empirical and internalthem how things should be done, to respect other
strife for two hundred years?religions and other cultures. This is a far better
The campaign is confusing, it lacks vision, it lacks away of ensuring sustainability.
sense of realism. It takes legitimacy from 9/11