A Summary of Turkey - EU Relations (2010)

David Cameron recently visited Turkey toissue?
express his support for Turkey to join theBritish PM David Cameron confirmed that the UK
European Union as a member state - a view thatgovernment will support Turkish accession to the
is unpopular both with the French and GermanEU during a recent visit to Ankara in 2010:
governments but also with many supporters of"When I think about what Turkey has done to
Mr Cameron's own Conservative party.defend Europe as a NATO ally and what Turkey
Since the mid 1980s the Turkish government hasis doing today in Afghanistan alongside our
made EU membership a long-standing aim of itsEuropean allies, it makes me angry that your
platform to modernise both the economy and theprogress toward EU membership can be
political system of the Turkish state. However, infrustrated in the way it has been," Cameron said.
recent times, this aim has been frustrated by"It is wrong to say Turkey can guard the camp
European leaders who are seemingly increasinglybut not be allowed to sit inside the tent."
reluctant to grant Turkey full membership.The British position is supported by the USA,
Arguments for Turkey joining the EU.Spain and Italy as well as numerous other smaller
Turkey has a large and rapidly growing economyEuropean states.
which is already closely integrated with major EUHowever French President Nicolas Sarkozy has
trading partners such as the UK, Germany, Franceexpressed fundamental opposition to Turkey's
and Italy.entry into the EU citing geographical reasons to
Both Turkish and European companies wouldprevent EU accession:
benefit from Turkey's accession into the EU which"I do not believe that Turkey belongs to Europe,
would reduce barriers to trade stimulating foreignand for a simple reason: because it is in Asia Minor.
direct investment both in Turkey itself and fromWhat I wish to offer Turkey is a true partnership
Turkish to other European nations.with Europe, but not integration into Europe"
Since Roman times through to the Ottoman- N. Sarkosy, speaking in 2008
Empire and more recently as a member state ofGerman Chancellor Angela Merkel has also
NATO Turkey has always been historically andopposed Turkey's accession to the union
culturally tied to other European nations.advocating an alternative form of privileged
Turkey also remains an important European ally inpartnership as opposed to full membership.
the continued efforts to combat terrorism andIn 2006, Chancellor Merkel said "Turkey could be
provide regional stability to the Middle East. Manyin deep, deep trouble when it comes to its
political commentators have suggested thataspirations to join the European Union" arguing
Turkey should be welcomed into the Europeanthat its refusal to recognise the Greek Cypriot
Union in order to reward and reinforce thisstate would forestall full accession.
longstanding strategic partnership.Will Turkey be accepted into the EU in the near
Arguments against Turkey joining the EU.future?
Opponents of Turkish membership tend to raiseFor some, this question boils down to whether the
the following issues.Turkey should be seen as a "European" nation.
Firstly, they argue that Turkish culture ad valuesThis depends on how you define "Europe" as a
are inherent different to shared European norms.geographical, historical and/or cultural concept.
Secondly, Turkey continues to refuse formalAccording to this view, in defining Europe you set
recognition for the state of Cyprus, a fully fledgedparameters which in turn will produce geographical
member of the European Union. The Turkishborders, historical boundaries or cultural limits. The
government will have to acknowledge Cyprus toanswer to the question is then simple - does
be considered a contender for membership.Turkey fit within these parameters or outside of
Thirdly, many human rights campaigners arethem?
concerned about the rights of the Kurdish ethnicFor others, the question is more of a calculation,
group who live in the Eastern border regions ofthey ask: do the economic benefits (trade,
Turkey and harbour separatist ambitions from themarket access) outweigh the political costs
Turkish state.(immigration flows, further sovereignty dilution).
The Kurdish people have limited civil liberties andOn this view, entry to the EU should depend less
there have been reports of widespreadon whether Turkey is European per se but rather
discrimination and repression which will need toon the basis of a cost-benefit analysis. If the
stop for Turkey to be considered for Europeanbenefits outweigh the costs then Turkey should
membership.be admitted, if the opposite is true then it should
Where do the major EU states stand on thisnot.